Details

    • Type: Task
    • Status: Done (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Normal
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None

      Description

      During the work of PIPE2D-1582, we realized that getting Gaia fluxes from PFS spectra is tricky because the Gaia filter responses extend to <380nm, where PFS does not cover. There are multiple ways to deal with this, but this ticket is going to explore a simple but physically motivated way to infer the Gaia fluxes from PFS instead of a simple extrapolation of PFS spectra.

        Attachments

        1. response.png
          response.png
          47 kB
        2. gaia_g.png
          gaia_g.png
          26 kB
        3. gaia_g_fit.png
          gaia_g_fit.png
          40 kB
        4. gaia_bp.png
          gaia_bp.png
          24 kB
        5. gaia_bp_fit.png
          gaia_bp_fit.png
          39 kB

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            msyktnk Masayuki Tanaka added a comment -

            The filter responses to be assumed here are Gaia G and Bp, and their responses truncated at 380nm, where the PFS coverage ends. See the plot here.

            Show
            msyktnk Masayuki Tanaka added a comment - The filter responses to be assumed here are Gaia G and Bp, and their responses truncated at 380nm, where the PFS coverage ends. See the plot here.
            Hide
            msyktnk Masayuki Tanaka added a comment -

            Using the Pickles stellar library and limiting the stellar type to A-G stars, I got this figure. As expected, the Gaia G-band response at <380nm only has a small effect and the magnitude difference in the truncated G-band filter is only 0.017mag. The scatter is small; 0.003mag. In practice, the scatter will be even smaller because we limit the FLUXSTD spectral types to a narrower range (i.e., we use late-A to early-G only). So, I think we can safely use G = G_truncated + 0.017 for FLUXSTDs.

             

            Show
            msyktnk Masayuki Tanaka added a comment - Using the Pickles stellar library and limiting the stellar type to A-G stars, I got this figure. As expected, the Gaia G-band response at <380nm only has a small effect and the magnitude difference in the truncated G-band filter is only 0.017mag. The scatter is small; 0.003mag. In practice, the scatter will be even smaller because we limit the FLUXSTD spectral types to a narrower range (i.e., we use late-A to early-G only). So, I think we can safely use G = G_truncated + 0.017 for FLUXSTDs.  
            Hide
            msyktnk Masayuki Tanaka added a comment -

            As for Bp, the effect is larger; the median magnitude difference is 0.1mag. However, the scatter is still only ~1%. I could fit polynomials to the points here, but I am not sure if that is needed. Maybe the simplest solution is just to do Bp = Bp_truncated + 0.101.

             

            Show
            msyktnk Masayuki Tanaka added a comment - As for Bp, the effect is larger; the median magnitude difference is 0.1mag. However, the scatter is still only ~1%. I could fit polynomials to the points here, but I am not sure if that is needed. Maybe the simplest solution is just to do Bp = Bp_truncated + 0.101.  
            Hide
            msyktnk Masayuki Tanaka added a comment -

            OK, I fitted polynomials just in case they are useful.

            Show
            msyktnk Masayuki Tanaka added a comment - OK, I fitted polynomials just in case they are useful.

              People

              • Assignee:
                msyktnk Masayuki Tanaka
                Reporter:
                msyktnk Masayuki Tanaka
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: