Uploaded image for project: 'DRP 1D pipeline'
  1. DRP 1D pipeline
  2. PIPE1D-51

Bad redshift determination with version 0.22.0?

    Details

      Description

      The simple sanity check on the redshift determination in the recent end-to-end processing (see attached) seems to show strangely bad redshift determination. The redshifts from 1D pipeline are mostly ~0.9 or ~2.3. Could you confirm that this is real or I'm doing something wrong? I'm using version 0.22.0 and the configuration is attached. The results are also in https://pfs.ipmu.jp/internal/devarch/ipmu/pipe_e2e/ .

      check_redshift_determination.pdf

      parameters_e2e.json

        Attachments

          Activity

          Hide
          kiyoto.yabe Kiyoto Yabe added a comment -

          This may be due to the issue in PIPE2D-873, which will be resolved with the new simulated data.

          Show
          kiyoto.yabe Kiyoto Yabe added a comment - This may be due to the issue in PIPE2D-873 , which will be resolved with the new simulated data.
          Hide
          kiyoto.yabe Kiyoto Yabe added a comment -

          This is an example pfsObject, which is z=1.4979 object but the 1D result is 2.2925. 

          pfsObject-00001-00000-0,0-0000000000000318-006-0x7ace412dc05971ff.fits

          Show
          kiyoto.yabe Kiyoto Yabe added a comment - This is an example pfsObject, which is z=1.4979 object but the 1D result is 2.2925.  pfsObject-00001-00000-0,0-0000000000000318-006-0x7ace412dc05971ff.fits
          Hide
          vlebrun vlebrun added a comment -

          The two horizontal lines in the z_meas vs z_true plot are typical of artefacts at given wavelength that are mistaken for emission lines. z=2.29 is a redshift for which OII corresponds to a strong sky emission line, and therefore the subtraction residual can be identified as OII (see plot Skyline_1226nm). We have to check the associated variance, and decide wether we'll have to mask this spectrum part.

          Show
          vlebrun vlebrun added a comment - The two horizontal lines in the z_meas vs z_true plot are typical of artefacts at given wavelength that are mistaken for emission lines. z=2.29 is a redshift for which OII corresponds to a strong sky emission line, and therefore the subtraction residual can be identified as OII (see plot  Skyline_1226nm ). We have to check the associated variance, and decide wether we'll have to mask this spectrum part.
          Hide
          vlebrun vlebrun added a comment -

          Indeed the error associated to the spectrum does not indicate that this pseudo emission line is not real but the mask has a non zero value. We therefore have to include the mask values in the 1D pipeline. I'll open a new ticket

          Show
          vlebrun vlebrun added a comment - Indeed the error associated to the spectrum does not indicate that this pseudo emission line is not real but the mask has a non zero value. We therefore have to include the mask values in the 1D pipeline. I'll open a new ticket
          Hide
          kiyoto.yabe Kiyoto Yabe added a comment -

          Thank you for the investigation. Can I close this ticket and move to the new ticket?

          Show
          kiyoto.yabe Kiyoto Yabe added a comment - Thank you for the investigation. Can I close this ticket and move to the new ticket?
          Hide
          vlebrun vlebrun added a comment -

          yes for sure

          Show
          vlebrun vlebrun added a comment - yes for sure
          Hide
          kiyoto.yabe Kiyoto Yabe added a comment -

          OK, thank you. I closed this one.

          Show
          kiyoto.yabe Kiyoto Yabe added a comment - OK, thank you. I closed this one.

            People

            • Assignee:
              vlebrun vlebrun
              Reporter:
              kiyoto.yabe Kiyoto Yabe
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: