-
Type: Task
-
Status: Open (View Workflow)
-
Priority: Normal
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Component/s: ics_xcu_smb
-
Labels:None
# normal: 2023-12-01 06:25:17.582Z smb 20 tcpip.py:93 new cmd: ?t 2023-12-01 06:25:17.583Z smb 20 tcpip.py:76 reply: 154.8147,276.4454,157.0904,134.6539,278.0847,400.0000,400.0000,400.0000,400.0000,400.0000,162.1743,162.7146 2023-12-01 06:25:19.200Z smb 20 tcpip.py:93 new cmd: ?F1 2023-12-01 06:25:19.209Z smb 20 tcpip.py:76 reply: 0 # glitch, either in heater read back code or command loop: 2023-12-01 06:25:19.222Z smb 20 tcpip.py:93 new cmd: ?L1 2023-12-01 06:25:22.228Z smb 30 tcpip.py:70 no reply to command! 2023-12-01 06:25:22.465Z sensors 30 sensor_loop.py:57 loop period is too short. last=1.70141e+09, next=1.70141e+09, dt=-2.31219 2023-12-01 06:25:22.467Z smb 20 tcpip.py:93 new cmd: ?V1 2023-12-01 06:25:22.468Z smb 20 tcpip.py:76 reply: 1 # after this, the command outputs are out of sync. 2023-12-01 06:25:32.394Z smb 20 tcpip.py:93 new cmd: ?t 2023-12-01 06:25:32.395Z smb 20 tcpip.py:76 reply: 0.0 2023-12-01 06:25:33.905Z smb 20 tcpip.py:93 new cmd: ?F1 2023-12-01 06:25:33.906Z smb 20 tcpip.py:76 reply: 154.8151,276.4445,157.0902,134.6539,278.0853,400.0000,400.0000,400.0000,400.0000,400.0000,162.1750,162.7149
So flush reply buffer more aggressively.