https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.3.4 803005 13-09-2019 https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/SIM2D-58 DRP 2-D Simulator <p>We should probably use real darks to inject real cosmic rays.</p> SIM2D-58

Include cosmic rays in simulations

Story Major Won't Fix Won't Fix Unassigned rhl Fri, 12 Sep 2014 17:55:39 +0000 Thu, 8 Aug 2019 19:41:09 +0000 Thu, 8 Aug 2019 19:41:09 +0000 0 4 <p>We now have some real darks with cosmic rays. Not quite sure about the exposure-time coverage though</p> <p>I agree that this is better done with real darks. I think you need to sort out if we have enough darks, and make sure that the commissioning plan at LAM will take enough data for the simulator</p> <p>As mentioned in the earlier comment, this is better done with darks.</p> <p>This ticket was closed incorrectly. Reopened.</p> <p>Why reopened? Aren't we just going to use a piles of real darks? Exposure time is expected to be pretty uniform, so we don't need very <em>many</em> piles. Spend a few nights getting ~50 900s darks per night?</p> <p><a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=cloomis" class="user-hover" rel="cloomis">cloomis</a> is correct - this ticket is now misleading. We need to acquire additional darks from LAM. So will close this ticket and create a new one for that purpose.</p> <p>Closed ticket again.</p> Development Epic Link SIM2D-1 Rank 0|03a900: