<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (8.3.4#803005-sha1:1f96e09b3c60279a408a2ae47be3c745f571388b) at Sat Feb 10 15:31:08 JST 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>PFS-JIRA</title>
    <link>https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>8.3.4</version>
        <build-number>803005</build-number>
        <build-date>13-09-2019</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[REDMINE1D-281] [RM-8212] [linemeas] fit a distinct wavelength offset and velocity dispersion on overlapping elements</title>
                <link>https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/REDMINE1D-281</link>
                <project id="11002" key="REDMINE1D">1D Redmine </project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#505f79&quot;&gt; Created on 2023-08-16 09:13:50 by Didier Vibert. % Done: 0&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;issue raised by @ytemmam when looking at SDSS fitted Ha vs direct-integration fluxes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;when several elements are overlapping (eg Ha and NII) a unique wavelength offset and width (velocity dispersion) is fitted for the complex, whereas each element should have its own offset and width. Of course the fit has still to be done jointly.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="23796">REDMINE1D-281</key>
            <summary>[RM-8212] [linemeas] fit a distinct wavelength offset and velocity dispersion on overlapping elements</summary>
                <type id="3" iconUrl="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=10518&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Task</type>
                                            <priority id="10000" iconUrl="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/images/icons/priorities/medium.svg">Normal</priority>
                        <status id="1" iconUrl="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/images/icons/statuses/open.png" description="The issue is open and ready for the assignee to start work on it.">Open</status>
                    <statusCategory id="2" key="new" colorName="blue-gray"/>
                                    <resolution id="-1">Unresolved</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="r2j.migrate">Redmine-Jira Migtation</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="r2j.migrate">Redmine-Jira Migtation</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 18:15:37 +0000</created>
                <updated>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 18:17:05 +0000</updated>
                                                                                <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>1</watches>
                                                                <comments>
                            <comment id="34390" author="r2j.migrate" created="Fri, 25 Aug 2023 18:16:56 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Comment by Vincent Le Brun on 2023-08-24 09:41:16:&lt;br/&gt;
Didier Vibert wrote:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; when several elements are overlapping (eg Ha and NII) a unique wavelength offset and width (velocity dispersion) is fitted for the complex, whereas each element should have its own offset and width. Of course the fit has still to be done jointly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;is it true? If the overlap is only on the continuum the fit could be done independently . It is only if the lines overlap that a combined fit is to be done. But I&apos;m not sure it will modify results&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="34391" author="r2j.migrate" created="Fri, 25 Aug 2023 18:17:02 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Comment by Didier Vibert on 2023-08-24 12:29:21:&lt;br/&gt;
Vincent Le Brun wrote in #note-1:&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; Didier Vibert wrote:&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; &lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; &amp;gt; when several elements are overlapping (eg Ha and NII) a unique wavelength offset and width (velocity dispersion) is fitted for the complex, whereas each element should have its own offset and width. Of course the fit has still to be done jointly.&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; &lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; is it true? If the overlap is only on the continuum the fit could be done independently . It is only if the lines overlap that a combined fit is to be done. But I&apos;m not sure it will modify results&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;the polynomial coefficients modelling the continuum have to be fitted jointly with the superposed lines: thus all lines parameters and the polynomial coeffs have to be fitted together &lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                    <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                <customfield id="customfield_10500" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10010" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>0|zzsz9j:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>