<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (8.3.4#803005-sha1:1f96e09b3c60279a408a2ae47be3c745f571388b) at Sat Feb 10 15:31:02 JST 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>PFS-JIRA</title>
    <link>https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>8.3.4</version>
        <build-number>803005</build-number>
        <build-date>13-09-2019</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[REDMINE1D-271] [RM-8192] Contrainte d&apos;amplitude des raies modele QSO</title>
                <link>https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/REDMINE1D-271</link>
                <project id="11002" key="REDMINE1D">1D Redmine </project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#505f79&quot;&gt; Created on 2023-07-24 11:24:30 by Vincent Le Brun. % Done: 0&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;dans le dernier run VIPERS j&apos;ai d&#233;tect&#233; des cas ou le modele QSO est choisi sans aucune raie en emission (amplitude 0). Il y a forc&#233;ment des raies en emission fortes dans un spectre de QSO, il faut donc imposer une amplitude minimale sur le tpl_ratio du modele&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="23749">REDMINE1D-271</key>
            <summary>[RM-8192] Contrainte d&apos;amplitude des raies modele QSO</summary>
                <type id="3" iconUrl="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=10518&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Task</type>
                                            <priority id="10000" iconUrl="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/images/icons/priorities/medium.svg">Normal</priority>
                        <status id="1" iconUrl="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/images/icons/statuses/open.png" description="The issue is open and ready for the assignee to start work on it.">Open</status>
                    <statusCategory id="2" key="new" colorName="blue-gray"/>
                                    <resolution id="-1">Unresolved</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="r2j.migrate">Redmine-Jira Migtation</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="r2j.migrate">Redmine-Jira Migtation</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 18:15:32 +0000</created>
                <updated>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 18:21:55 +0000</updated>
                                                                                <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>1</watches>
                                                                <comments>
                            <comment id="36581" author="r2j.migrate" created="Thu, 11 Jan 2024 18:20:52 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Comment by Pierre-yves Chabaud on 2023-07-25 06:38:49:&lt;br/&gt;
S&apos;il y a obligatoirement des raies d&apos;&#233;missions larges dans un spectre QSO et que le linemodel pr&#233;f&#232;re choisir une solution avec amplitude nulle, je suis curieux de savoir quelle combinaison de param&#232;tres permet d&apos;arriver a ce choix (continuum sur-puissant ? ratio manquant de le catalogue ?).&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="36582" author="r2j.migrate" created="Thu, 11 Jan 2024 18:21:24 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Comment by Vincent Le Brun on 2023-07-25 11:18:28:&lt;br/&gt;
et voil&#224;. Le modele galaxie donne la bonne solution &#224; z=0.51&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;image-wrap&quot; style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/attachment/17001/17001_Unknown-7.png&quot; style=&quot;border: 0px solid black&quot; /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="36583" author="r2j.migrate" created="Thu, 11 Jan 2024 18:21:34 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Comment by Didier Vibert on 2024-01-11 13:30:00:&lt;br/&gt;
should wait multiobs #6028&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                    <attachments>
                            <attachment id="17001" name="Unknown-7.png" size="323135" author="r2j.migrate" created="Thu, 11 Jan 2024 18:21:47 +0000"/>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                <customfield id="customfield_10500" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10010" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>0|zzsz07:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>