https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.3.4 803005 13-09-2019 https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/PIPE2D-1298 DRP 2-D Pipeline <p>I had a quick look at the results of the weekly run dated August 31st (2D version 2023.35).</p> <p>the results are globally OK (the object type selection works fine for example. The success rate in redshift measurement is only about 70%, dur to unmasked spikes (see below). As well some individual spectra show some peculiar issues :</p> <p>NIR arm flux calibration</p> <p><span class="image-wrap" style=""><img src="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/attachment/16320/16320_WR_3108_NIR_fluxcalib.png" height="281" width="500" style="border: 0px solid black" /></span></p> <p>Red arm flux calibration</p> <p><span class="image-wrap" style=""><img src="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/attachment/16318/16318_WR_3108_red_fluxcalib.png" height="298" width="530" style="border: 0px solid black" /></span></p> <p><span class="image-wrap" style=""><img src="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/attachment/16317/16317_WR_3108_red_fluxcalib_2.png" height="299" width="532" style="border: 0px solid black" /></span></p> <p>There are some remaining spikes which are nor flagged nor masked (producing most of the redshift measurement errors)</p> <p><span class="image-wrap" style=""><img src="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/attachment/16319/16319_WR_3108_spikes.png" height="300" width="534" style="border: 0px solid black" /></span></p> <p>and in this spectrum there is a huge gap at the R/N interface (or close to)</p> <p><span class="image-wrap" style=""><img src="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/attachment/16316/16316_WR_3108_mask.png" height="324" width="576" style="border: 0px solid black" /></span></p> <p> </p> PIPE2D-1298

August 31st Weekly run feedback

Bug Normal Open Unresolved Unassigned vlebrun Mon, 4 Sep 2023 14:50:37 +0000 Tue, 5 Sep 2023 22:05:55 +0000 0 7 <p>Results are identical on the Sept. 4th run processed with PIPE2D 2023.36</p> <p>Could you please report what version of the weekly+scienceSims simulated data was used, and check the <tt>md5</tt> of the following file:</p> <div class="code panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="codeContent panelContent"> <pre class="code-java"> 16b39d46d814dee289e5e2b9a1579ba2 /projects/HSC/PFS/scienceSims/scienceSims-20230808/PFFB00100113.fits </pre> </div></div> <p>I think it's the same at IPMU.</p> <div class="code panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="codeContent panelContent"> <pre class="code-java"> 16b39d46d814dee289e5e2b9a1579ba2 /simdata/proc-spt/drp/pipe_e2e/regular_processing_new/regular_processing/scienceSims-20230808/PFFB00100113.fits </pre> </div></div> Development Rank 0|zzszfz: