<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (8.3.4#803005-sha1:1f96e09b3c60279a408a2ae47be3c745f571388b) at Sat Feb 10 16:05:10 JST 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>PFS-JIRA</title>
    <link>https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>8.3.4</version>
        <build-number>803005</build-number>
        <build-date>13-09-2019</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[PIPE2D-1260] flux calibration vector is zero for medium resolution data</title>
                <link>https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/PIPE2D-1260</link>
                <project id="10002" key="PIPE2D">DRP 2-D Pipeline</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;The flux calibration task does not work for the medium band data. Here is an example. I do not know which part of the task failed but will dig into it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;image-wrap&quot; style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/attachment/16160/16160_image+%281%29.png&quot; style=&quot;border: 0px solid black&quot; /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="23715">PIPE2D-1260</key>
            <summary>flux calibration vector is zero for medium resolution data</summary>
                <type id="3" iconUrl="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=10518&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Task</type>
                                            <priority id="10000" iconUrl="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/images/icons/priorities/medium.svg">Normal</priority>
                        <status id="1" iconUrl="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/images/icons/statuses/open.png" description="The issue is open and ready for the assignee to start work on it.">Open</status>
                    <statusCategory id="2" key="new" colorName="blue-gray"/>
                                    <resolution id="-1">Unresolved</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="msyktnk">Masayuki Tanaka</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="msyktnk">Masayuki Tanaka</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 08:02:03 +0000</created>
                <updated>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 10:11:35 +0000</updated>
                                                                                <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>3</watches>
                                                                <comments>
                            <comment id="34181" author="msyktnk" created="Wed, 26 Jul 2023 22:52:48 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The zero flux calibration vector was due to a stupid bug in my code, and it is actually non-zero. But, the flux-calibrated pfsSingle seems to show a discontiguity in the overall normalization between the b and m arms.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;image-wrap&quot; style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/attachment/16187/16187_image-2023-07-27-07-52-04-987.png&quot; style=&quot;border: 0px solid black&quot; /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="34182" author="msyktnk" created="Wed, 26 Jul 2023 22:54:32 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;...and it is not clear the possible offset is due to flux calibration or something else.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="34183" author="price" created="Wed, 26 Jul 2023 23:10:34 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The normalisation spectra for &lt;tt&gt;b&lt;/tt&gt; and &lt;tt&gt;m&lt;/tt&gt; come from different exposures (taken at very different times), so I think that&apos;s expected.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="34184" author="msyktnk" created="Wed, 26 Jul 2023 23:19:41 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;So, the offset is due to the way&#160; (or when) the quartz spectra were taken? The offset is already there in pfsMerged. Note that the plotted are different objects from the plot above. &lt;span class=&quot;image-wrap&quot; style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/attachment/16188/16188_image-2023-07-27-08-19-38-100.png&quot; style=&quot;border: 0px solid black&quot; /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="34185" author="price" created="Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:36:51 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;That&apos;s right.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="34186" author="rhl" created="Thu, 27 Jul 2023 01:51:05 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;We could/should use the brn data in conjunction with bmn to fix the normalisation of the m data.  Do we need a separate ticket for that work?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="34191" author="msyktnk" created="Thu, 27 Jul 2023 10:11:35 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Yabe-kun told me that we took a set of bmn quartz data in this run. Perhaps new calibs from this run may solve the problem?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10003">
                    <name>Relates</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="relates to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="23690">PIPE2D-1251</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                            <attachment id="16160" name="image (1).png" size="16629" author="msyktnk" created="Wed, 19 Jul 2023 08:01:26 +0000"/>
                            <attachment id="16187" name="image-2023-07-27-07-52-04-987.png" size="69416" author="msyktnk" created="Wed, 26 Jul 2023 22:51:57 +0000"/>
                            <attachment id="16188" name="image-2023-07-27-08-19-38-100.png" size="70999" author="msyktnk" created="Wed, 26 Jul 2023 23:19:30 +0000"/>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                <customfield id="customfield_10500" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10010" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>0|zzsysv:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>