https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.3.4 803005 13-09-2019 https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/PIPE2D-1187 DRP 2-D Pipeline <p>With the upcoming run in April 2023, we'll have opportunities to take calibration data.<br/> This list describes dataset that are <b>required</b> to reduce data properly but also some that we consider useful for DRP development.</p> <p>spectrograph : 1,3<br/> arm : b,r,m,n</p> <ul> <li>set of scienceTrace, steady quartz source, with all cobra at home(5-10 duplicates), <b>required</b>, 10 minutes</li> <li>ditheredFlats to build masterFlat for n1, 45 minute with one duplicate.</li> <li>set of scienceArc, neon,hgcd,xenon,krypton with all cobra at home(1-3 duplicate per lamp) <b>required</b> 20 minutes (maybe we get around using sky lines but I think we still want those 20 minutes)</li> <li>for fiberProfiles construction, take 1/3rd fiberProfiles with 5 dither position <span class="error">&#91;-0.4, -0.2, 0, 0.2, 0.4&#93;</span>, 1 duplicate + same 5 dither position where all cobras are hidden. ~30 minutes per configuration, so 1h30.</li> <li>dot penumbra study, move to those designs and take flats.</li> <li>diffused light/background study, hide all cobras, then reveal cobras in a appropriate pattern, (2, 4, 8, 16..)</li> <li>defocus data set (TBD)</li> </ul> <p>data taken is listed <a href="https://sumire.pbworks.com/w/page/152988447/Calibration%20Data%20from%20Run%2011" class="external-link" rel="nofollow">here</a> . </p> PIPE2D-1187

Plan for data acquisition April 2023 run

Task Normal Done Done Unassigned arnaud.lefur EngRun Fri, 17 Mar 2023 17:10:56 +0000 Fri, 30 Jun 2023 19:33:09 +0000 Fri, 19 May 2023 14:49:00 +0000 0 7 <p>As of 2023.04.30, the following dataset was taken (see also <a href="https://sumire.pbworks.com/w/page/152988447/Calibration%20Data%20from%20Run%2011" class="external-link" rel="nofollow">https://sumire.pbworks.com/w/page/152988447/Calibration%20Data%20from%20Run%2011</a> where we can track the processing history of these data):</p> <ul> <li>ScienceArc (b, m) <ul> <li>Ne  (20s) : visit=91414, 92350 - 92352</li> <li>Kr  (60s) : visit=91415, 92353 - 92355</li> <li>Xe  (90s) : visit=91416, 92356 - 92358</li> <li>Ar  (120s) : visit=91417, 92359 - 92351</li> <li>HgCd (30s) : visit=91804 - 91807</li> </ul> </li> <li>ScienceArc (b, r) <ul> <li>Ne  (10s) : visit=92569 - 92571</li> <li>Kr  (30s) : visit=92572 - 92574</li> <li>Xe  (45s) : visit=92575 - 92577</li> <li>Ar  (60s) : visit=92578 - 92580</li> </ul> </li> <li>ScienceTrace (b, m) <ul> <li>ring lamp, 100V (12s) : visit 91427 - 91436</li> </ul> </li> <li>ScienceTrace (b, r) <ul> <li>There were bunch of 60-sec exposure at Home for other experiments</li> </ul> </li> <li>ScienceTrace <img class="emoticon" src="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/images/icons/emoticons/thumbs_down.png" height="16" width="16" align="absmiddle" alt="" border="0"/> <ul> <li>91014 (60-sec), 91015 (60-sec dark), 91016 (60-sec)</li> </ul> </li> <li> ditheredFlats <ul> <li>from -7pix to 0pix, 1/3pix step : visit=91292 - 91339 , 91958 - 92005</li> <li>from 0pix to +7 pix, 1/3 pix step : visit=92029 - 92080</li> <li>from -0.4pix to +0.4 pix, 0.2 pix step: visit = 92251 - 92257 (set3, 1/4 out), 92272 - 92278 (1/2 out, set3) , 92317 - 92323 (set4, 1/4 out), 92330 - 92336 (set4, 1/2 out)</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <ul> <li>fiberProfiles <ul> <li>set1 <ul> <li>fullDensity = <span class="error">&#91;91808&#93;</span></li> <li>allHidden = <span class="error">&#91;91837, 91838&#93;</span></li> <li>1vs4_set0 = <span class="error">&#91;91840, 91841&#93;</span></li> <li>vs12 = <span class="error">&#91;91843, 91844&#93;</span></li> </ul> </li> <li>set2 <ul> <li>fullDensity2 = <span class="error">&#91;91907, 91908, 91909&#93;</span></li> <li>allHidden2 = <span class="error">&#91;91936, 91937, 91938, 91939, 91940&#93;</span></li> <li>vs14_set1 = <span class="error">&#91;91942, 91943, 91944, 91945, 91946&#93;</span></li> <li>vs12_2 = <span class="error">&#91;91948, 91949, 91950, 91951, 91952&#93;</span> </li> </ul> </li> <li>set 3 <ul> <li>fullDensity2 = <span class="error">&#91;92203, 92204, 92205&#93;</span></li> <li>allHidden2 = <span class="error">&#91;92232, 92233, 92234, 92235, 92236,92242, 92243, 92244&#93;</span></li> <li>allHidden (m,b)= <span class="error">&#91;92237, 92238, 92239, 92240, 92241&#93;</span></li> <li>1vs4_set3 = <span class="error">&#91;92246, 92247, 92248, 92249, 92250, 92263, 92264, 92265&#93;</span> (r,b), <span class="error">&#91;92258, 92259, 92260, 92261, 92262&#93;</span> (m,b)</li> <li>1vs4_set3 dithered(0.25pix) (r,b) <span class="error">&#91;92251..92257&#93;</span></li> <li>1vs2 = <span class="error">&#91;92267, 92268, 92269, 92270, 92271&#93;</span> (r,b),</li> <li>1vs2 dithered(0.25pix) (r,b) 92272..92278</li> </ul> </li> <li>set 4 <ul> <li>allHidden2 = <span class="error">&#91;92306, 92307, 92308, 92309, 92310&#93;</span></li> <li>1vs4_set2 = <span class="error">&#91;92312, 92313, 92314, 92315, 92316&#93;</span></li> <li>1vs4_set2 dithered(0.25pix) <span class="error">&#91;92317..92323&#93;</span></li> <li>1vs2 = <span class="error">&#91;92325, 92326, 92327, 92328, 92329&#93;</span></li> <li>1vs2 dithered(0.25pix) <span class="error">&#91;92330..92336&#93;</span></li> </ul> </li> <li>set5 <ul> <li>allHidden = <span class="error">&#91;92413..92417&#93;</span></li> <li>1vs4_set0 = <span class="error">&#91;92426..92430&#93;</span></li> <li>1vs4_set0 dithered(0.25pix) = <span class="error">&#91;92419..92425&#93;</span></li> </ul> </li> <li>set6 <ul> <li>fullDensity = <span class="error">&#91;92909..92911&#93;</span></li> <li>allHidden = <span class="error">&#91;92938..92942&#93;</span></li> <li>1vs32_set1 = <span class="error">&#91;92944..92946&#93;</span></li> <li>1vs16_set1 = <span class="error">&#91;92948..92950&#93;</span></li> <li>1vs8_set1 = <span class="error">&#91;92952..92954&#93;</span></li> <li>1vs4_set1 = <span class="error">&#91;92956..92958&#93;</span></li> <li>1vs2 = <span class="error">&#91;92960..92962&#93;</span></li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li>Dot penumbra study <ul> <li>set2 <ul> <li>dotPenumbra = 91398</li> <li>atHome = 91401</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li>PSF modeling <ul> <li>Ne, slit=-4mm,0mm,+4mm <ul> <li>all hiden: visit=92794 - 92802 , every 10 fiber out: visit = 92804 - 92812</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li>Uniformity <ul> <li>Twilight sky : <br/> 4/21, InR=0: visit = 91183 - 91187 (note; n1 is missing for 91183)</li> <li>sky_field1, PA=0 (0x1ae6c59babbd5a12) <ul> <li>4/25, : visit = 91881 (450s)</li> </ul> </li> <li>sky_field3 <ul> <li>4/25, PA=0, visit = 91901 (450s, 0x14a520008e4566e5)</li> <li>4/28, PA=0 : visit = 92843 - 92844 (450s, 0x14a520008e4566e5) . Note: 92843 is off-focus by -300um.</li> <li>4/28, PA=-120 : visit = 92646 (450s, 0x2a2086fb133ef1ba)</li> <li>4/29, PA=0 : visit = 92735 (450s, 0x14a520008e4566e5)</li> <li>4/29, PA=+120 : visit = 92738 (450s, 0x1fd165b4a96944ae)</li> <li>4/29, PA=-120 : visit = 92740 (450s, 0x2a2086fb133ef1ba)</li> <li>4/29, (after 92740 rotator was moved to PA=0) : visit = 92741 (450s)</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>The fiberProfile sets do not include the requested slit dither. The slit dither is important to measure the sub-pixel profile for the central fibers.</p> <p>The ditheredFlat set does not include repeats for the dithers, which leaves them vulnerable to CRs. The set needs to be repeated from the start; it is not sufficient to attempt to take new data at the previous slit positions.</p> <p>Can I request for the future that when a set of arcs is taken, that a quartz also be taken as part of the same set? The quartz contains a lot of information in the spatial dimension that helps with getting a good detectorMap solution.</p> <p>Thanks for the new fiberProfiles data! I believe it’s allowed us to make the best fiberProfile measurements yet (see attached files). In particular, the problems we used to have with fibers at the center of r1 don’t appear to be present. We had previously attributed those problems to imprecise detectorMaps, but I now believe that it was caused by a lack of sampling, and the inclusion of the slit dithers has solved it. There are some fibers that have weird profiles, which mainly appears due to malfunctioning cobras (84,85,86,114), and some lower-level issues, but I’m very happy with this. I hope that we’ll be able to repeat it with m1, m3 and n1 when the data for those becomes available.</p> <p>For the record, I used the following datasets:</p> <div class="code panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="codeContent panelContent"> <pre class="code-java"> set5_allHidden, set5_1vs4_set0_dithered, set4_1vs4_set2_dithered, set3_1vs4_set3_dithered, set2_vs14_set1, set3_1vs2_dithered, set4_1vs2_dithered </pre> </div></div> Relates PIPE2D-1244 Development Rank 0|zzswdg:hr Sprint PreEng11Apr1