<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (8.3.4#803005-sha1:1f96e09b3c60279a408a2ae47be3c745f571388b) at Sat Feb 10 16:03:13 JST 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>PFS-JIRA</title>
    <link>https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>8.3.4</version>
        <build-number>803005</build-number>
        <build-date>13-09-2019</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[PIPE2D-1133] Correct fiber throughputs </title>
                <link>https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/PIPE2D-1133</link>
                <project id="10002" key="PIPE2D">DRP 2-D Pipeline</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;Paul Price commented in &lt;a href=&quot;https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/PIPE2D-1132&quot; title=&quot;b1 detectormap has incorrect wavelength solution&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;PIPE2D-1132&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;PIPE2D-1132&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The quartz spectra in the fiberProfiles have 3x higher flux on one side of the PFI than the other, so we need to fix that or it will adversely affect sky subtraction and flux calibration. If there isn&apos;t another set with more suitable illumination, I&apos;m hoping we can manually scale them to match the actual throughput from the sky (via a twilight exposure, maybe?).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Robert Lupton commented in same ticket:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have to sort out the fibre throughputs.  Twilight sky is one option (with field rotation!) but it&apos;s a bit tricky to get.  Another option is to use the bright sky lines (e.g. 5577 in the blue, and reasonably-isolated sets of Meinel lines in the red).  They should be uniform across the field of view to a percent or two, and we can beat that down as sqrt(N).  It&apos;d be good to confirm that both approaches give the same result.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="23175">PIPE2D-1133</key>
            <summary>Correct fiber throughputs </summary>
                <type id="3" iconUrl="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=10518&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Task</type>
                                            <priority id="10000" iconUrl="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/images/icons/priorities/medium.svg">Normal</priority>
                        <status id="10002" iconUrl="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/images/icons/statuses/generic.png" description="The issue is resolved, reviewed, and merged">Done</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="green"/>
                                    <resolution id="10000">Done</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="price">price</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="hassan">hassan</reporter>
                        <labels>
                            <label>EngRun</label>
                            <label>calib-mgmt</label>
                    </labels>
                <created>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 04:25:28 +0000</created>
                <updated>Tue, 7 Feb 2023 22:36:40 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Sat, 17 Dec 2022 00:41:48 +0000</resolved>
                                                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>1</watches>
                                                                <comments>
                            <comment id="32008" author="price" created="Sat, 17 Dec 2022 00:41:48 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The 3x variation of fluxes within a spectrograph module appears to be due to a combination of vignetting in the corrector and scale changes with radius. It does not mean that the spectrograph has 3x less throughput at large radius, as point sources will not scale the same.&lt;br/&gt;
There is a ~40% difference between the fluxes for r1 and r3 (r3 is larger). It&apos;s not yet clear where this comes from.&lt;br/&gt;
Both these variations appear to normalise out using the quartzes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The current fiber profiles normalisations have a bunch of holes, due to NANs from masked pixels in the combined image; I&apos;ve fixed this.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Merged changes to master after a quick informal review by &lt;a href=&quot;https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=hassan&quot; class=&quot;user-hover&quot; rel=&quot;hassan&quot;&gt;hassan&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10003">
                    <name>Relates</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="relates to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="23174">PIPE2D-1132</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                            <attachment id="15475" name="image (2).png" size="275433" author="price" created="Sat, 17 Dec 2022 00:47:35 +0000"/>
                            <attachment id="15477" name="pipe2d-1133.ipynb" size="3095040" author="price" created="Sat, 17 Dec 2022 00:52:58 +0000"/>
                            <attachment id="15476" name="Xnip2022-12-16_19-48-32.jpg" size="418839" author="price" created="Sat, 17 Dec 2022 00:48:53 +0000"/>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                <customfield id="customfield_10500" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10010" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>0|02qph7:0gi</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10100" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:userpicker">
                        <customfieldname>Reviewers</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>hassan</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10005" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-sprint">
                        <customfieldname>Sprint</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue id="162">2DDRP-2023 A</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                    </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>