https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.3.4 803005 13-09-2019 https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/PIPE2D-1013 DRP 2-D Pipeline <p>Code implementation of the second half of flux calibration, in which pfsMerged and pfsFluxReference are read and the flux-calibrated spectra and calibration parameters are generated. The draft was provided in <a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/PIPE2D-1002" title="Write a draft code of the second half part of flux calibration" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="PIPE2D-1002"><del>PIPE2D-1002</del></a>. </p> <p>We use an averaged flux calibration vector across the focal plane at this moment. </p> PIPE2D-1013

Implementation of the second half of flux calibration (use the average flux calibration vector)

Task Normal Done Done sogo.mineo Takuji Yamashita flux-calibration Tue, 29 Mar 2022 02:50:06 +0000 Mon, 18 Apr 2022 01:09:03 +0000 Mon, 18 Apr 2022 01:09:03 +0000 0 4 <p>Could you review the two PRs?</p> <p>I copied half of <tt>runDataRef()</tt> from fluxCalibrate.py. I did not add unit tests, but the executable `fitFluxCal.py` actually ran without errors when I input the integration test's data with a modification in which I added multiband fiberFluxes to pfsConfig. I could not tell whether the output <tt>fluxCals</tt> were good or not because of <a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/PIPE2D-1012" title="Quality of FluxModelInterpolator&#39;s output is bad" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="PIPE2D-1012"><del>PIPE2D-1012</del></a></p> <p>Merged. Thanks for the review.</p> Blocks PIPE2D-373 PIPE2D-899 PIPE2D-1002 Development Epic Link PIPE2D-303 Rank 0|zzstfj: Reviewers price