https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.3.4 803005 13-09-2019 https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/INSTRM-648 Instrument control development <p>We need to agree on dcbActor instance name.</p> <p>ccdActor is expecting dcb_%(specName)s, but it always has been named dcb here.</p> <p>For that reason, some data taken recently has header issues ( eg W_PFDSGN is missing ...)</p> <p>I'm not against dcb_%(specName)s, but i'm not sure to see what are we gaining.</p> INSTRM-648

agreeing on dcbActor instance name

Task Normal Done Done cloomis arnaud.lefur SM1 Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:33:42 +0000 Fri, 12 Apr 2019 17:43:52 +0000 Fri, 12 Apr 2019 17:43:52 +0000 ics_ccdActor 0 2 <p>For LAM, <tt>dcb</tt> is clearly fine. And I now understand there will also only be one at Subaru. So <tt>dcb</tt> it should be. If that is what the name has been at LAM, I'll use this ticket to modify <tt>ics_ccdActor</tt>.</p> <p>Merged at 5cf95ed, tagged 1.3.11</p> Relates PIPE2D-404 Development Rank 0|zx0080: Sprint SM1-2019 E