https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.3.4 803005 13-09-2019 https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/INSTRM-578 Instrument control development <p>The FITS working group has decided that the science detectors should get a slit hole id vs lambda WCS. Rough wavelength solution is fine.</p> <p>Not obvious which `pfsDetectorMap` to use.</p> INSTRM-578

Create WCS for science detectors

Task Normal Done Done cloomis cloomis EngRun FITS SPS Tue, 11 Dec 2018 07:02:33 +0000 Thu, 4 Nov 2021 16:30:37 +0000 Thu, 4 Nov 2021 16:30:36 +0000 ics_ccdActor ics_hxActor pfs_utils 0 3 <p>Whatever routine implements this should return both the WCS cards and the 'DISPERSR', 'WAVELEN', 'WAV-MAX', and 'WAV-MIN' cards as specified in <a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/INSTRM-1022" title="Add Subaru-compliant spectroscopy cards" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="INSTRM-1022"><del>INSTRM-1022</del></a>. </p> <p>I will make a <tt>pfs_utils.getSpsWcs(module, arm)</tt> routine to return the <a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/INSTRM-1022" title="Add Subaru-compliant spectroscopy cards" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="INSTRM-1022"><del>INSTRM-1022</del></a> cards for now, based on the static optical design. If we eventually need to do a <em>good</em> job, the routine could pick up as-built and/or as-aligned optical configurations.</p> <p>We still need information on how well we need to do for the WCS: is linear in lambda, fiberId good enough to put in now? Can/should someone (not me) make a better map?</p> <p>Further discussion yielded the following agreement: we will add a simple linear WCS, mapping FITS pixel (1,1) to pixel (0,0). We will <b>not</b> attempt anything with wavelengths or fiber IDs.</p> <p>ics_utils merged at 1717ece,  tagged 1.0.0<br/> ics_ccdActor merged at f9b5e0a, tagged 1.7.1</p> <p> </p> Relates INSTRM-1022 Development Rank 0|zzs8ut:wi Sprint PreEngRun4 Story Points 1.0