https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.3.4 803005 13-09-2019 https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/INSTRM-1956 Instrument control development <p>All (I think) of the N1 data taken at Subaru (and ingested in the Hilo server) thus far have</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>OBJECT = 'TEST ' / user-specified name </pre> </div></div> <p>in the header, while more informative names are used in the other arms.  Please make this card consistent with the other arms.</p> INSTRM-1956

Fix OBJECT card in the N1 header

Task Normal Done Done cloomis Masayuki Tanaka EngRun FITS Fri, 28 Apr 2023 05:35:23 +0000 Wed, 3 May 2023 04:17:38 +0000 Wed, 3 May 2023 04:17:38 +0000 EngRun 0 3 <p>I’m seeing some inconsistent values for OBJECT. I was mostly looking at the twilight data from 4/22 and each of the OBJECT fields is marked as “M44”, which doesn’t seem correct. A raster scan was done on M67 just prior to these twilight observations (according to the Night Logs), but that is also coming across as M44. Observations on M44 were done</p> <p>Just a notice. Basically during the observation, Gen2 is supposed to send the ""OBJECT keyword to PFS (though gen2 Actor). We didn't set OBJECT correctly. We are sorry about that.</p> <p>Tagged 2.7.6</p> Development Rank 0|zzswzj: