https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.3.4 803005 13-09-2019 https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/INSTRM-1769 Instrument control development <p>Recently DNSmasq configuration is checked to prepare SM3 AIT work. At that time, there are some points to be sorted out. Here is report from Yoshida-san on Slack:</p> <blockquote><p>The summit DNSmasq configuration has been updated to the latest master (commit 35bd765a) + some local mods. &amp; fixes. Please report any issues.<br/> Known differences from the previous production configuration:</p></blockquote> <blockquote><ul> <li>agcc-optiplex-755 gets 133.40.165.106, not .248</li> <li>pfi-temps<span class="error">&#91;23&#93;</span> has correct MAC address for old E-Box</li> <li>filterwheel-dcb conflicts with pdu2-dcb, thus commented out</li> </ul> </blockquote> <p> </p> INSTRM-1769

summit DNSmasq needs to be sorted out

Task Normal Done Done Yoshida, Hiroshige yuki.moritani Tue, 25 Oct 2022 19:28:55 +0000 Thu, 1 Feb 2024 09:29:02 +0000 Thu, 1 Feb 2024 09:28:56 +0000 ics_dnsmasq 0 3 <p>For the PFI-related points (the first and second bullets), it is comes from we assign the same IP to the devices on the old and new E-box.</p> <ul> <li>133.40.165.106 is assigned to small PC in the new E-box, and agcc-optiplex-755 gets IP (DHCP), so dnsmasq should be modified with small PC information</li> <li>There are 2 sets of temperature devices (pfi-temps 1,2,3, see below), and the PFI uses the second set. I'm not sure which is better: to have 6 devices with different IP, or update MAC address based on the box attached on PFI.</li> </ul> <p>PFI temperature devices (ADAM-6015)</p> <p>set 1: in the new E-box</p> <ul> <li>pfi-temps1: 00-D0-C9-F4-2A-78</li> <li>pfi-temps2: 00-D0-C9-F4-29-BE  (I confirmed this is correct)</li> <li>pfi-temps3: 00-D0-C9-F6-3F-60</li> </ul> <p>set 2: in the old E-box, and attached on PFI</p> <ul> <li>pfi-temps1: 00:d0:c9:f4:2a:78</li> <li>pfi-temps2: 74:fe:48:5b:7d:70</li> <li>pfi-temps3: 74:fe:48:5b:7d:9c</li> </ul> <p>So we cloned the MAC of pfi-temps1 (they are identical - that is one way to make swapping between two E-boxes easier - perhaps we should clone MACs of pfi-temps2 and pfi-temps3 as well)?</p> <p>filterwheel-dcb is on 133.40.165.123, as in master (commit 35bd765a). pdu2-dcb is moved to 133.40.165.124.</p> <p>In regard to pfi-temp<span class="error">&#91;23&#93;</span>, it is possible to clone the MAC address. Given that the old E-box is working in the current situation, we'll modify it after Dec run, when Chi-Hung is visiting Subaru.</p> <p>If you just want to have unchanging IP addresses for the various eboxes, I am pretty sure it is OK to have two MAC addresses for one hostname/IP address. You just have to make sure not to power/connect them both at the same time.</p> <p>In short term, until we confirm the new E-box is fine to use on the telescope, we may turn on both old E-box and new E-box, I guess.</p> <p>As far as dnsmasq itself goes I just complicated things a bit: I created the sm<span class="error">&#91;2-4&#93;</span> subaru host configs in dnsmasq-ics:/etc/dnsmasq.d and checked them in as myself. But I did not push, since I am not smart enough to do that from there.</p> <p><a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/INSTRM-2089" title="move pdu2-dcb (and else if any) from local to the host-subaru (and mac)" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="INSTRM-2089"><del>INSTRM-2089</del></a> was created to add pdu2-dcb. If there is no further item to sort out, I'll close this ticket.</p> Relates INSTRM-2089 Development Rank 0|zzsvav: