https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.3.4 803005 13-09-2019 https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/INSTRM-1716 Instrument control development <p><a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/DAMD-136" title="Datamodel reads in pfsDesign.guideStar objIds as 32bit not 64bit" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="DAMD-136"><del>DAMD-136</del></a> fixed a big where <tt>datamodel.PfsConfig</tt> loaded the guider objId as a 32-bit int instead of a 63-bit int. </p> <p>But the <tt>pfs_design_agc</tt> table has been populated by older versions of that code, and the <tt>guide_star_id</tt> column is junk.</p> <p>Please reload using the current pfs_utils. The version installed on pfsa is good.</p> INSTRM-1716

Reload pfs_design_agc table using fixed pfs_utils.

Task Normal Done Done Kiyoto Yabe cloomis EngRun Sat, 24 Sep 2022 16:37:07 +0000 Thu, 1 Dec 2022 03:00:29 +0000 Thu, 1 Dec 2022 02:55:29 +0000 opdb 0 3 <p>Appears that the same problem is apparent in the <tt>pfs_config_agc</tt> table also. </p> <p>Looks like recent <tt>pfsConfig/pfsDesigns</tt> s, eg those with designId <tt>0xb01f75df554a1ba</tt>, have been ingested without the <a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/DAMD-136" title="Datamodel reads in pfsDesign.guideStar objIds as 32bit not 64bit" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="DAMD-136"><del>DAMD-136</del></a> fix. But what is confusing is that the <tt>guide_star_id</tt> s in the <tt>agc_match</tt> table for this designId <em>do</em> look correct. This seems to imply that the <tt>agc_match</tt> table is populated differently to the <tt>pfs_design_agc</tt> table.</p> <p>Example <tt>(pfs_design_id, guide_star_id)</tt> pairs investigated are:</p> <div class="code panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="codeContent panelContent"> <pre class="code-java"> 0xb01f75df554a1ba, 4477444105481823616 0xb01f75df554a1ba, 4477443139107585920 </pre> </div></div> <p>(which were referred to by RHL in <a href="https://sumire-pfs.slack.com/archives/C9TDPMVHT/p1664081854893519" class="external-link" rel="nofollow">https://sumire-pfs.slack.com/archives/C9TDPMVHT/p1664081854893519</a>)</p> <p>So the <tt>pfs_design_id, guide_star_id</tt> values for the <tt>agc_match</tt>, <tt>pfs_design_agc</tt> and <tt>pfs_config_agc</tt> tables need to be cross-checked.</p> <p>For now, only `pfs_design_agc` table was repopulated with the fixed datamodel package. We will think about `pfs_config_agc` later. We should also cross-check with `agc_match` table.</p> <p><a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=kiyoto.yabe" class="user-hover" rel="kiyoto.yabe">Kiyoto Yabe</a>: can we close this ticket and file a separate ticket on remaining actions?</p> <p>Yes, I think so.</p> Relates INSTRM-1810 DAMD-136 Development Rank 0|zzst9l:zzc Sprint preEngRun08Nov Story Points 2.0