https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.3.4 803005 13-09-2019 https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/INSTRM-1534 Instrument control development <p>Currently, we define 10 micron for cobra convergence criteria. According to the actual operation, some cobra move to nowhere. However, some cobra just not close enough. Those cobra still contribute to survey with lower efficiency. Therefore, this ticket rise this question. Should we define a better convergence criteria other than a region number? </p> INSTRM-1534

Define a better convergence criteria

Task Normal Won't Fix Won't Fix chyan chyan EngRun Fri, 25 Feb 2022 04:05:31 +0000 Fri, 2 Sep 2022 12:56:33 +0000 Thu, 28 Jul 2022 16:08:41 +0000 0 2 <p>To be discussed in the next ICS/PFI telecon (or earlier) with <a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=rhl" class="user-hover" rel="rhl">rhl</a>.</p> <p><a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=rhl" class="user-hover" rel="rhl">rhl</a> proposed a different approach where a smoother metric, such as the fraction of the fiber illuminated, is used. Then after analysis, the criterion for establishing convergence can be better determined. </p> <p>Chi-Hung, Craig and Robert will discuss the best approach for this.</p> <p>According to the discussion, we should close this ticket and file more specific ticket based based on June run data.</p> Relates INSTRM-1649 Development Rank 0|02qpin:4 Sprint PreEngRun05 F preEngRun07Sep