<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (8.3.4#803005-sha1:1f96e09b3c60279a408a2ae47be3c745f571388b) at Sat Feb 10 16:35:17 JST 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>PFS-JIRA</title>
    <link>https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>8.3.4</version>
        <build-number>803005</build-number>
        <build-date>13-09-2019</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[INSTRM-1420] Publish final `pfsConfig` and `pfsDesign` FITS files, before taking sps/fps/mcs/agcc exposures.</title>
                <link>https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/INSTRM-1420</link>
                <project id="10300" key="INSTRM">Instrument control development</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;Before running any sps/fps/agcc/mcs command which might take an exposure, make sure the current config has been constructed and published.&#160;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Iterate over `sps.lightSources`, and gather the appropriate `fps.pfsConfig`, `sunss.pointing` and `dcb.bundles` values. When any of those values change, trigger the generation of a new, possibly aggregated, `pfsDesign/pfsConfig`.&lt;br/&gt;
&#160;&lt;br/&gt;
Put published FITS files in `/data/raw/$date/{pfsDesign,pfsConfig}/` &amp;#8211; these will be copied with the raw data. We want one `pfsConfig` file for each `visit0`, not one per visit.&lt;br/&gt;
&#160;&lt;br/&gt;
To highlight the most important configuration: when the `pfi` is the only light source, simply copy/link the `pfDesign` file from the targeting/planning software and the `pfsConfig` from the `fpsActor` output.&lt;br/&gt;
&#160;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="18283">INSTRM-1420</key>
            <summary>Publish final `pfsConfig` and `pfsDesign` FITS files, before taking sps/fps/mcs/agcc exposures.</summary>
                <type id="3" iconUrl="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=10518&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Task</type>
                                            <priority id="10000" iconUrl="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/images/icons/priorities/medium.svg">Normal</priority>
                        <status id="10002" iconUrl="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/images/icons/statuses/generic.png" description="The issue is resolved, reviewed, and merged">Done</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="green"/>
                                    <resolution id="10000">Done</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="cloomis">cloomis</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="cloomis">cloomis</reporter>
                        <labels>
                            <label>CanBeClosed</label>
                    </labels>
                <created>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 21:14:30 +0000</created>
                <updated>Wed, 1 Feb 2023 22:41:24 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Wed, 1 Feb 2023 22:41:23 +0000</resolved>
                                                                    <component>ics_iicActor</component>
                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>2</watches>
                                                                <comments>
                            <comment id="24903" author="naoyuki.tamura" created="Mon, 1 Nov 2021 18:40:08 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I don&apos;t have clear ideas about what &quot;final&quot; means, and what &quot;publish&quot; means ...&lt;br/&gt;
Depending on the intents of tests/observations represented by pfsDesign (and Config) files, the judgement of them being &quot;final&quot; and &quot;publish-iable&quot; may change I presume, so I suspect mechanism(s) with some human intervention are supposed to be discussed here? I am sorry very likely I am just ignorant and behind, but I appreciate a bit more elaboration about intents.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="24906" author="cloomis" created="Mon, 1 Nov 2021 20:37:11 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;This would be the place for the pfsDesign and pfsConfig files which actually get used and observed: the ones which are associated with some PFSx file. This is a subset of the pfsDesign files which are available to observe.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To be more concrete, when&#160;&lt;tt&gt;iic observePfsDesign designId=xxx&lt;/tt&gt; and thus &lt;tt&gt;fps moveToPfsDesign designId=xxx&lt;/tt&gt; get called, one design file from the location/directory which is populated by shuffle (see &lt;a href=&quot;https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/INSTRM-1416&quot; title=&quot;Define file tree location for the `pfsDesign` files from the planning software&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;INSTRM-1416&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;INSTRM-1416&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;) is read and instantiated by the fpsActor. It is also &quot;published&quot; by iic by being copied to, as proposed, &lt;tt&gt;/data/raw/$date/pfsDesign/&lt;/tt&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="32179" author="arnaud.lefur" created="Wed, 1 Feb 2023 22:41:24 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;We now have pfsConfig created before each sps exposure which I think mostly what this ticket was aiming for.&lt;br/&gt;
The pfsConfig merging is implemented for dcb + SuNSS, but not for pfi+dcb|SuNSS .&lt;br/&gt;
Let&apos;s close this one at least, and open new tickets if necessary.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10000">
                    <name>Blocks</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="blocks">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="18285">INSTRM-1422</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </outwardlinks>
                                                        </issuelinktype>
                            <issuelinktype id="10003">
                    <name>Relates</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="relates to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="18307">INSTRM-1427</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </outwardlinks>
                                                        </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                <customfield id="customfield_10500" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10010" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>0|02qpjd:00r3000ka</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>