https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.3.4 803005 13-09-2019 https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/INSTRM-1389 Instrument control development <p>Quoting <a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=rhl" class="user-hover" rel="rhl">rhl</a> in his email 2021-11-07:</p> <blockquote> <p>Do we have the book-keeping in opdb to know which camera we are using? It looks as if a string field for "MCS" or "71M" should be added to the <tt>mcs_exposure</tt> table. </p></blockquote> INSTRM-1389

Store the MCS camera used in the opDB

Task Normal Done Done Kiyoto Yabe hassan EngRun Mon, 11 Oct 2021 14:51:17 +0000 Fri, 5 Nov 2021 00:53:57 +0000 Fri, 5 Nov 2021 00:53:57 +0000 0 2 <p>Although there might be two cameras (so far), I'm proposing to create a new table `mcs_camera` table for MCS camera id. I'm thinking that id=0 for MCS and 1 for 71M, which will be stored in `mcs_exposure` as well. Any comments are welcome.</p> <div class="code panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="codeContent panelContent"> <pre class="code-python"> <span class="code-keyword">class </span>mcs_camera(Base): __tablename__ = <span class="code-quote">'mcs_camera'</span> mcs_camera_id = Column(Integer, primary_key=<span class="code-keyword"><span class="code-object">True</span></span>, autoincrement=<span class="code-keyword"><span class="code-object">False</span></span>, comment=<span class="code-quote">'MCS camera identifier [0=MCS, 1=71M]'</span>) mcs_camera_name = Column(String, comment=<span class="code-quote">'MCS camera name [e.g. <span class="code-quote">"MCS"</span>, <span class="code-quote">"71M"</span>]'</span>) comments = Column(String) <span class="code-keyword">def</span> __init__(<span class="code-keyword">self</span>, mcs_camera_id, mcs_camera_name, comments): <span class="code-keyword">self</span>.mcs_camera_id = mcs_camera_id <span class="code-keyword">self</span>.mcs_camera_name = mcs_camera_name <span class="code-keyword">self</span>.comments = comments  </pre> </div></div> <p> </p> <p>I'm not sure who should be the reviewer but feel free to re-assign.</p> <p>No objections with the proposed new table.</p> <p>Related to that, there is a discussion in the #pfi-ics slack channel today, in which the camera names would be <tt>rmod_71M</tt> and <tt>canon_mcs</tt>.</p> <p>merged and closed</p> Relates INSTRM-1390 Development Rank 0|zzsgak: Reviewers hassan Sprint PreEngRun4 EngRun3Cleanup Story Points 1.0