<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (8.3.4#803005-sha1:1f96e09b3c60279a408a2ae47be3c745f571388b) at Sat Feb 10 16:21:41 JST 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>PFS-JIRA</title>
    <link>https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>8.3.4</version>
        <build-number>803005</build-number>
        <build-date>13-09-2019</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[INSTRM-113] Archiver log is saturating /tmp/</title>
                <link>https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/INSTRM-113</link>
                <project id="10300" key="INSTRM">Instrument control development</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;Until now archiver log was created on &lt;b&gt;mhs machine&lt;/b&gt; under  &lt;em&gt;/tmp/&lt;/em&gt; (default parameters)&lt;br/&gt;
However there is only 10 Gb available on this partition.&lt;br/&gt;
As a result after a month, the folder is saturated and causes the archiver to crash.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Firstly, do we want to keep those logs ? To be honest we haven&apos;t done it so far.&lt;br/&gt;
Secondly, is there different level of logging ? Because, currently the logfile size is growing really quickly, even quicker than the database itself.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For now, it&apos;s save locally under another partition(500GB), but we could also use our NFS mount.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Any thoughts ?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="11609">INSTRM-113</key>
            <summary>Archiver log is saturating /tmp/</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=10503&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="3" iconUrl="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/images/icons/priorities/major.svg">Major</priority>
                        <status id="10002" iconUrl="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/images/icons/statuses/generic.png" description="The issue is resolved, reviewed, and merged">Done</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="green"/>
                                    <resolution id="10000">Done</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="arnaud.lefur">arnaud.lefur</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="arnaud.lefur">arnaud.lefur</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Wed, 17 May 2017 13:19:08 +0000</created>
                <updated>Tue, 29 May 2018 20:44:44 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Tue, 29 May 2018 20:44:44 +0000</resolved>
                                                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>3</watches>
                                                                <comments>
                            <comment id="12152" author="cloomis" created="Wed, 17 May 2017 14:23:15 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I think the logs are basically worthless.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="12195" author="arnaud.lefur" created="Tue, 23 May 2017 10:16:51 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;committed &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/Subaru-PFS/ics_archiver/commit/dd464817909a79c3321c539b9c39470a4cd6d64b&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://github.com/Subaru-PFS/ics_archiver/commit/dd464817909a79c3321c539b9c39470a4cd6d64b&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="12197" author="atsushi.shimono" created="Tue, 23 May 2017 10:37:28 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;why not to have ticket specific branch??&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="12198" author="arnaud.lefur" created="Tue, 23 May 2017 12:02:33 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Yes, I could have done it that way &lt;a href=&quot;https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=cloomis&quot; class=&quot;user-hover&quot; rel=&quot;cloomis&quot;&gt;cloomis&lt;/a&gt; ?&lt;br/&gt;
To be clear you mean :&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;create a branch named &apos;&lt;a href=&quot;https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/INSTRM-113&quot; title=&quot;Archiver log is saturating /tmp/&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;INSTRM-113&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;INSTRM-113&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&apos;&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;make my local change&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;merge with master whenever the problem is solved&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</comment>
                            <comment id="12200" author="cloomis" created="Tue, 23 May 2017 14:13:40 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Yes. Specifically:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;git checkout -b tickets/&lt;a href=&quot;https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/INSTRM-113&quot; title=&quot;Archiver log is saturating /tmp/&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;INSTRM-113&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;INSTRM-113&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;work work work, all checked in.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;git checkout master&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;git merge --no-ff tickets/&lt;a href=&quot;https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/INSTRM-113&quot; title=&quot;Archiver log is saturating /tmp/&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;INSTRM-113&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;INSTRM-113&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;


</comment>
                            <comment id="12205" author="atsushi.shimono" created="Fri, 26 May 2017 18:53:22 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I believe, we&apos;d better&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;to make things possible to be tracked, especially for records at later phase including after delivery to Subaru. (somehow detailed) records of development history is a key for people working on maintenance to understand how/why code is organized as it is&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;not to make multiple working versions in different branches, both for reducing maintenance load of codes and making people easy to install/use&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;to have one PR per one modification, for getting clear review on both code and planning/functionality in quality and consistency point of view&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</comment>
                            <comment id="13419" author="hassan" created="Tue, 29 May 2018 20:44:44 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Changes long since merged. Considered resolved.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10002">
                    <name>Duplicate</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="duplicates">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="11389">INSTRM-42</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </outwardlinks>
                                                        </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                <customfield id="customfield_10500" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10010" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>0|ii0227:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>