https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.3.4 803005 13-09-2019 https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/INFRA-48 Software Development Infrastructure <p>Add new project "DB" (SPT database) for database development underway by Yasuda-san.<br/> better project name (and description?) are desired.</p> INFRA-48

Add new project "DB"

Task Major Won't Fix Won't Fix Unassigned shimono Thu, 28 Jul 2016 06:12:57 +0000 Tue, 10 Jan 2017 02:24:15 +0000 Tue, 10 Jan 2017 02:24:15 +0000 0 2 <p>How about, "OPDB" &#8211; it's the Operational Database.</p> <p>good point. OPDB seems better.<br/> let me get Yasuda-san here.</p> <p><a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=naoki.yasuda" class="user-hover" rel="naoki.yasuda">naoki.yasuda</a> let me hear your thought.</p> <p><a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=rhl" class="user-hover" rel="rhl">rhl</a> Although I filed as database system for survey operation currently under development by Yasuda-san, but do we better to have only one project for entire DB things (from on-site operation to survey science)? How do you think?</p> <p><span class="error">&#91;From offline discussion at collaboration meeting 2016&#93;</span></p> <p>Items relates on survey operation is now pointed to the SURVEY project, which contains ETC (exposure time calculator). This OPDB could be in the SURVEY project, as well.<br/> For "database" organization point of view, science analysis operation is now separated from others, in collaboration with MSIP etc., and is handled in the DB project.</p> <p>So, for now, close this ticket without nothing, and guide the database for survey operation into the SURVEY project.</p> Development Epic Link INFRA-43 Rank 0|ii00m7: