https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.3.4 803005 13-09-2019 https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/INFRA-286 Software Development Infrastructure <p>The Ras-pi used fiber monitoring system (FMS), which is the device to check connection if the cable B is connected to SpS and PFI (or SuNSS), was shipped to Subaru with the Cable B1. The dnsmasq needs to be modified to have the host.</p> <p>Since there is no section for the Cable B allocated in the <a href="https://github.com/Subaru-PFS/ics_doc/blob/master/SoftwareStudyNote/SSN-00028/ipaddr.rst" class="external-link" rel="nofollow">current IP range</a> I'd like to add it to either PFI or MCS section..</p> INFRA-286

Add RasPi for fiber monitoring system to dnsmasq

Task Normal Done Done Yoshida, Hiroshige yuki.moritani Tue, 9 Feb 2021 07:51:58 +0000 Sun, 18 Dec 2022 05:14:42 +0000 Sun, 18 Dec 2022 05:14:42 +0000 0 3 <p><a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=cloomis" class="user-hover" rel="cloomis">cloomis</a> <a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=hiro" class="user-hover" rel="hiro">Yoshida, Hiroshige</a> I'd like to hear your opinion. If you don't have any preference, I'd like to have FMS in the PFI section, the same as SuNSS, simply because the both are located at IR3.</p> <p>I'd also go for PFI. Umm, because it has to do with fibers?</p> <p>Looking the entries relating pfi for now, I'd propose the following IP (and hostnames)</p> <p> # The FMS pi at IR3 floor<br/> 133.40.164.111  fms pfsmonitor</p> <p>MAC address is " <tt>b8:27:eb:a4:9f:10</tt> "</p> <p>This update has been implemented.</p> Development Rank 0|zzs408: