https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.3.4 803005 13-09-2019 https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/DAMD-86 Data Model <p>I specified the catId formats as <tt>%03d</tt>, but upon further consideration and discussion with <a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=msyktnk" class="user-hover" rel="msyktnk">Masayuki Tanaka</a> I think we should change this to <tt>%04d</tt>.</p> <p>The problem is that open-use may well define a <tt>catId</tt> for every program, and 1000 may not be enough.</p> DAMD-86

Please add another digit to catId

Story Normal Done Done hassan rhl Tue, 4 Aug 2020 14:21:46 +0000 Mon, 4 Jan 2021 20:23:06 +0000 Wed, 9 Sep 2020 20:01:09 +0000 0 6 <p>I started to think that we may even want %05d if we consider more than 10 years of science operations with PFS.  If we accept 100 programs per year (including fillers), each of which comes with 5 different catId's on average, we will have 5000 catId's in 10 years,  Given that each of the numbers here comes with an uncertainty, I think it is safer to adopt %05d.</p> <p>Ok. I don't think there are any issues with accommodating this.</p> <p>If there are no objections by Weds Aug 26 I'll implement %05d.</p> <p>Ok, %05d will be also implemented on 1D drp</p> <p>Datamodel python code is incomplete, python/pfs/datamodel/drp.py must be edited to allow correct writing and parsing of pfsObject. I can update branch tickets/<a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/DAMD-86" title="Please add another digit to catId" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="DAMD-86"><del>DAMD-86</del></a> if necessary.</p> <p> </p> Relates DAMD-87 Development Rank 0|02qprn:u Reviewers price Sprint 2DDRP-2021 A