https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.3.4 803005 13-09-2019 https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/DAMD-132 Data Model <p><a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/DAMD-97" title="Add missing 2D pipeline outputs" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="DAMD-97"><del>DAMD-97</del></a> will audit <tt>datamodel.txt</tt> for missing 2D pipeline products and add anything that's missing. However, it's not clear whether we need python I/O implementations in the datamodel package for the "Class II" products (not commonly used by science users, e.g., the sky flux models and flux calibration vectors; see <a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/DAMD-97" title="Add missing 2D pipeline outputs" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="DAMD-97"><del>DAMD-97</del></a>). One clear reason to add a python I/O implementation would be if it is anticipated that the science database will include these products.</p> <p>Could you please report whether you anticipate the science database including "Class II" pipeline products?</p> DAMD-132

Will the science database include "Class II" pipeline products?

Story Normal Open Unresolved Masayuki Tanaka price Thu, 5 May 2022 18:42:27 +0000 Mon, 3 Jul 2023 01:09:47 +0000 0 2 <p>We do not need the I/O interfaces now, but we may want to have them in the future.  We will make all data products including intermediate pipeline products available at the science database.  Science users will not use, e.g., calibration files, very often as you say, but if they find I/O interfaces useful, then we can consider implementing them.  So, my answer to your question is; let's leave it as a future question, unless we need to freeze the datamodel package now for good.</p> Relates DAMD-97 Development Rank 0|02qpjd:4 Story Points 1.0