https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.3.4 803005 13-09-2019 https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/DAMD-105 Data Model <p>I don't think that we have a way to specify and track which arms are to be/were used to expose a given set of fibres. If I'm right, we should add this information to the pfsDesign (and thus pfsConfig) file. The easiest way would be to add it to the PDU along with the <tt>RA</tt> and <tt>DEC</tt> (and <tt>ROTANG</tt> <a href="https://pfspipe.ipmu.jp/jira/browse/DAMD-100" title="Add the design position angle to pfsDesign" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="DAMD-100"><del>DAMD-100</del></a>) as e.g. <tt>ARMS = 'brn'</tt><br/> This is sufficient for downstream users to figure out what we did, but as a courtesy we should add this information to the metadata for pfsMerged and pfsObject files too.</p> DAMD-105

Include which arms should be used in the pfsDesign/pfsConfig file

Story Normal Done Done hassan rhl Fri, 18 Dec 2020 21:33:17 +0000 Fri, 2 Apr 2021 00:18:21 +0000 Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:36:16 +0000 0 2 <p>In the pfsDesign/Config? Really? I can see indicating what the intended coverage of a pointing is, but isn't which arms are exposed a property which is chosen long after the design/config has been fixed? Or do you mean instances which are created after the data have been taken? </p> <p>I think so.  You know if you're designing a GA plate (m) or a regular plate (r) once you know the target list.   So I think that this is a natural place to specify the complete PFS configuration.</p> Relates PIPE2D-741 SIM2D-134 Development Rank 0|02qpt6:508yl0chzzy00008 Reviewers price Sprint 2DDRP-2021 A 2 Story Points 2.0