[PIPE2D-959] Use throughput from Expected Performance Summary to characterize blue/red drop Created: 09/Dec/21  Updated: 23/Dec/22  Resolved: 23/Dec/22

Status: Won't Fix
Project: DRP 2-D Pipeline
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Task Priority: Normal
Reporter: ncaplar Assignee: ncaplar
Resolution: Won't Fix Votes: 0
Labels: None
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original Estimate: Not Specified

Attachments: File pfs_thr_20211220sm1_ext_all_blu.dat     File pfs_thr_20211220sm1_ext_all_red.dat    
Issue Links:
Relates
relates to PIPE2D-958 Add dummy cable b continuum data, for... Open
Story Points: 3
Reviewers: hassan

 Description   

As pointed out in SPS-hardware telecon on December 8, 2021, the offical performance of the instrument is characterized in https://sumire.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/129441444/PFS-GEN-IPM003001-01_pfs_expected_performance_KYabe_20170731.pdf. Figure 2 containts the throughput curves, which should be consistent with the figure here: https://sumire.pbworks.com/w/file/142508139/pfs_science_meeting_2020_zoom_yabe.pdf.

The goal is to use these curves, toghether with known (are they completly known) spectrums of continuum lamps to understand what kind of blue/red drop do we expect. We also need to understand if predictions from Erin and Jim are consistent with these throughput curves.

I will assing this ticket to me, but I expect a lot of input from Erin.



 Comments   
Comment by ncaplar [ 07/Jan/22 ]

I have uploaded the attachments that Kiyoto has uploaded to the #drp-2d channel, that characterize SM1

Comment by ncaplar [ 23/Dec/22 ]

Given the circumstances, I do not believe this is something that I will be able to do. I am putting ``Won't Fix'' as I do not think this is critical issue. Please reassign if needed. This is related to PIPE2D-959 which may be closed if this one is closed.

Generated at Sat Feb 10 16:00:22 JST 2024 using Jira 8.3.4#803005-sha1:1f96e09b3c60279a408a2ae47be3c745f571388b.