[PIPE2D-959] Use throughput from Expected Performance Summary to characterize blue/red drop Created: 09/Dec/21 Updated: 23/Dec/22 Resolved: 23/Dec/22 |
|
| Status: | Won't Fix |
| Project: | DRP 2-D Pipeline |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | ncaplar | Assignee: | ncaplar |
| Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Story Points: | 3 | ||||||||
| Reviewers: | hassan | ||||||||
| Description |
|
As pointed out in SPS-hardware telecon on December 8, 2021, the offical performance of the instrument is characterized in https://sumire.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/129441444/PFS-GEN-IPM003001-01_pfs_expected_performance_KYabe_20170731.pdf. Figure 2 containts the throughput curves, which should be consistent with the figure here: https://sumire.pbworks.com/w/file/142508139/pfs_science_meeting_2020_zoom_yabe.pdf. The goal is to use these curves, toghether with known (are they completly known) spectrums of continuum lamps to understand what kind of blue/red drop do we expect. We also need to understand if predictions from Erin and Jim are consistent with these throughput curves. I will assing this ticket to me, but I expect a lot of input from Erin. |
| Comments |
| Comment by ncaplar [ 07/Jan/22 ] |
|
I have uploaded the attachments that Kiyoto has uploaded to the #drp-2d channel, that characterize SM1 |
| Comment by ncaplar [ 23/Dec/22 ] |
|
Given the circumstances, I do not believe this is something that I will be able to do. I am putting ``Won't Fix'' as I do not think this is critical issue. Please reassign if needed. This is related to |