I have created the spectra for our lamp lines at Subaru. The visit used are:

Krypton - from visits 71155, 71156, 71157
Argon - from visits 71162, 71163, 71164
Xenon - from visits 71159, 71160, 71161
Neon - from visits 68640, 68641, 68642
Hgcd - from visit 67757
Haloen - from visit 68087

I generate the lines by using interpolateFlux (from from pfs.drp.stella.interpolate) to interpolate all fibers from an exposure to the same grid. I then calculate mean out of all of the interpolated fibers, from all of the avaliable exposures. I normalize the flux to 1 second, by dividing the data by the effective exposure time.

I have also created csv files, which I have shared with JEG.

Hassan can you please check that you can load pandas files and that they look reasonable?

What was the quality of the wavelength solutions?

Sent to JEG for his comments. Still working with him to understand if he is satisfied with the analysis I did.

price Can you perhaps elaborate? To get spectra I ran reduceExposure, and then interpolateFlux on pfsArm.flux arrays. See November 11, 2021 discussion in zoom chat with me, you and Hassan. I ran reduceExposure because reduceArc does not succeed for all arclines (if there are no lines on r or b detector for that particular arcline), so I wanted to be consistent across all detectors and lines. I have a felling that you would do something much differently?

Did reduceExposure use the adjustDetectorMap feature? If so, what did it report as the quality of the fit?

No, because it fails when there are not enough lines (fails in doAperatureCorrection ) step. Typical command I have used is:

reduceExposure.py /projects/HSC/PFS/Subaru --calib /projects/HSC/PFS/Subaru/CALIB-PFI-20211220/ --rerun ncaplar/PIPE2D-953 --id visit=71155 -j 20 -c isr.doFlat=False doAdjustDetectorMap=False photometerLines.doApertureCorrection=False --clobber-config

Paul, I reran with  
doAdjustDetectorMap=True photometerLines.doApertureCorrection=False
and these are summary results at the end of processing. Find results in the gist below. Is that what you had in mind?

https://gist.github.com/nevencaplar/cdf761414ddd7febf42dc541ea49d01a

That's good, thanks.

I am currently waiting for comments by Jim if the format I have provided is acceptable to him. If he does not get back to me I will ask him on Monday meeting. I have also rerun everything with doAdjustDetectorMap=True, and changes are minor. If Jim gives ok, I will upload the final version and close.

I have talked with Jim today. He is fine with the format and information contained, he only wants the continuum (halogen) lamp to be added to the mix.

Added another version. The difference from last attempt is:

1. Continuum added
2. Pipeline ran with detectorMap being adjusted using lines from each lamp. Makes minimal differences to the actual result.