[PIPE2D-929] Psf modelling with fiber illumination constant across spots in the same fiber with 2+ spots Created: 02/Nov/21 Updated: 21/Dec/21 Resolved: 21/Dec/21 |
|
| Status: | Done |
| Project: | DRP 2-D Pipeline |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | ncaplar | Assignee: | ncaplar |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Story Points: | 5 | ||||||||
| Sprint: | 2DDRP-2021 A12 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
At the moment, the algorithm implemented in |
| Comments |
| Comment by ncaplar [ 18/Nov/21 ] |
|
I have implemented the changes and sent a test run to the cluster before I went to Hawaii (started on Nov13). It seems that calculation is not finished by Nov17, indicating some sort of problem. |
| Comment by ncaplar [ 19/Nov/21 ] |
|
The problem was that I have filled my user directory on tigress. I have cleaned my user directory (which had some old reduced data that should be in rerun directories, and many intermediate files from creation of poststamp images which could be deleted) and rerouted my outputs to scratch/gpfs which is a) actually proper way to do it and b) has more space. I have noticed that the code is slower than I expected, i.e., when I analyze 8 spots it is around 50% slower than analyzing 8 individual images. I am making a small profiling run to see what is happening. |
| Comment by ncaplar [ 20/Nov/21 ] |
|
The slowdown on della was happening because I did not execute export OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 before running my code (see https://jira.lsstcorp.org/browse/DM-4714) |
| Comment by ncaplar [ 21/Dec/21 ] |
|
I implemented this code some time ago already. I will shortly describe the figures I attached here and which I described during one of the telecons. You can see |