[PIPE2D-870] Code implementation of the continuum subtraction task for flux calibration Created: 19/Jul/21 Updated: 14/Dec/21 Resolved: 14/Dec/21 |
|
| Status: | Done |
| Project: | DRP 2-D Pipeline |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Story | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | Takuji Yamashita | Assignee: | sogo.mineo |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | flux-calibration | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Epic Link: | flux calibration | ||||||||
| Reviewers: | hassan | ||||||||
| Description |
|
Write a code to perform the continuum subtraction of spectra for flux calibration work in the 2DDRP pipeline. The draft code is based on the study in |
| Comments |
| Comment by price [ 19/Jul/21 ] |
|
Please consider the existing FitContinuumTask. |
| Comment by Takuji Yamashita [ 19/Jul/21 ] |
|
Thank you. I will try it whether it works as I intend. |
| Comment by rhl [ 20/Jul/21 ] |
|
If it doesn't, then we should look at what we need to change. I really don't want to end up with two different fitting tasks if we can avoid it. |
| Comment by Takuji Yamashita [ 24/Aug/21 ] |
|
This is a comparison of two scripts for continuum subtraction. I tried fitContinuumTask (red) and my script that uses a median filter (blue). As a result, we can substitute fitContinuumTask in flux calibration work. A continuum from fitContinuumTask is very similar to that from my script. |
| Comment by Takuji Yamashita [ 24/Aug/21 ] |
| Comment by Takuji Yamashita [ 14/Dec/21 ] |
|
We can close this ticket because a function of the continuum subtraction (using FitContinuumTask) is now included in the main code of flux calibration, not an independent code. The continuum subtraction function in flux calibration will be reviewed in the main code (PIPE2D-922). |