[PIPE2D-791] Stability tests: separate visits into calibration and 'science' Created: 23/Mar/21 Updated: 13/Jan/22 |
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | DRP 2-D Pipeline |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | hassan | Assignee: | arnaud.lefur |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Story Points: | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Sprint: | 2DDRP-2021 A3, 2DDRP-2021 A 4, 2DDRP-2021 A5, 2DDRP-2021 A 6, 2DDRP-2021 A 7, 2DDRP-2021 A 8, 2DDRP-2021 A 10 | ||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Introduce a scheme such that during automatic processing of calibration data a set of visits are held back. These held-back data are used to mimic science observations and validate the quality of the calibration products. |
| Comments |
| Comment by rhl [ 24/Mar/21 ] |
|
It sounds as if this overlaps with the work we gave arnaud.lefur to examine the stability data and make sense of it. |
| Comment by hassan [ 24/Mar/21 ] |
|
Following yesterday's Princeton Group telecon, I planned to file a new ticket on arnaud.lefur to go through the stability data, make sense of it, and identify 'good' visits that we can use for automatic processing. Then this current ticket would take those 'good' visits and divide it into to those used for generating calib products, and those used to as 'science' to check the quality of the stability data and processing. Both tickets can be assigned to Arnaud. Does that make sense? |