[PIPE2D-73] Several PfsMapper.paf glitches Created: 07/Sep/16 Updated: 23/Jul/19 Resolved: 23/Jul/19 |
|
| Status: | Won't Fix |
| Project: | DRP 2-D Pipeline |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | cloomis | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Description |
|
1. The output of a detrend.py was postISRCCD/2016-09-01/v0000057/PFSAr1.fits. Shouldn't that be ..../PFSA-000057-1r.fits? I.e. can I change
to:
2. Likewise for calexp. 3. While at it, can we swap arm and spectrograph for spArm? 4. And should the spArm key be pfsArm? |
| Comments |
| Comment by hassan [ 03/Nov/18 ] |
|
Confirm with cloomis whether this can be resolved. |
| Comment by hassan [ 21/Jul/19 ] |
|
To quickly review with cloomis and price against current DRP code. |
| Comment by price [ 23/Jul/19 ] |
|
I've confirmed that 1 and 2 have been done (we have postIsrCcd-%(site)s%(category)s%(visit)06d%(arm)s%(spectrograph)1d.fits and calExp-%(site)s%(category)s%(visit)06d%(arm)s%(spectrograph)1d.fits). Regarding 3 and 4, I don't know what spArm was, but it doesn't exist any more. I recommend closing this. |
| Comment by cloomis [ 23/Jul/19 ] |
|
I concur. |