example_of_problem.png
[PIPE2D-699] Rerun 2d-psf analysis for spots with neighbors Created: 20/Jan/21 Updated: 09/Feb/21 Resolved: 26/Jan/21 |
|
| Status: | Done |
| Project: | DRP 2-D Pipeline |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | ncaplar | Assignee: | ncaplar |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
example_of_problem.png
|
| Story Points: | 2 |
| Description |
|
During analysis of data with the code that keeps illumination consistent as a function of defocus ( Identify the problem, fix and rerun this part of analysis. |
| Comments |
| Comment by ncaplar [ 26/Jan/21 ] |
|
I seem to have identified the problem. The issue was in using floats in Psf_position.fill_crop function, within Zerike_Module. The floats can not be used at slices, and the issues is resolved when using integers. I am not sure why did this work before (probably a change when updating python versions?). While working on this problem I have discovered that some values identifying how parameters of ``secondary images'' are connected to the primary image (i.e., the offset and the strength of the second spot present) were wrong for Argon spots. I have corrected that.
|
| Comment by ncaplar [ 09/Feb/21 ] |
|
I also discovered that at the subpixel level, x and y coordinates were mixed. I have fixed that for future iterations of the code. |