Spatial dep of dithering.png
[PIPE2D-588] Is there dependence in dithering as a function of position on detector Created: 27/May/20 Updated: 28/May/20 Resolved: 28/May/20 |
|
| Status: | Done |
| Project: | DRP 2-D Pipeline |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | ncaplar | Assignee: | ncaplar |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
Spatial dep of dithering.png
|
| Story Points: | 2 |
| Description |
|
As discussed with Jim, Fabrice and SPS group, we want to investigate if the dithering problem identified in |
| Comments |
| Comment by ncaplar [ 28/May/20 ] |
|
I have analyzed the Subaru 9 dithering data. I have selected the data from a) leftmost fiber b) rightmost fiber c) lowest wavelength avaliable d) highest wavelength avaliable e) central part of the detector (x between 1500 and 2500, y between 1500 and 2500) and conducted the same analysis as in At least on this level, I see no difference as a function of the position on the detector. Closing this ticket and if more specific or automatic analysis is going to be conducted I suggest to capture that in new tickets. |