[PIPE2D-564] Investigate discontinuity in some of the April 2020 PSF solutions Created: 23/Apr/20 Updated: 05/Jan/21 Resolved: 12/May/20 |
|
| Status: | Done |
| Project: | DRP 2-D Pipeline |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | ncaplar | Assignee: | ncaplar |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Story Points: | 2 | ||||||||
| Sprint: | 2DDRP-2021 A | ||||||||
| Description |
|
When doing preliminary analysis of the solution in |
| Comments |
| Comment by ncaplar [ 23/Apr/20 ] |
|
The reason why there is some discontinuity is that there are more broad lines. Out of 4 HgI lines in the red, I have identified two HgAr lines, at 690 and 708 are obviously broader then nearby Neon lines. The flux for other lines is too low to make firm conclusions.
I have been using the line at 690 in my solutions. I will have to artificially narrow that line (as in
|
| Comment by ncaplar [ 28/Apr/20 ] |
|
Talked with Jim this morning (Mon, April 27, 2020). Jim suggests:
|
| Comment by ncaplar [ 12/May/20 ] |
|
I will close this ticket and put the suggestion by Jim in new tickets for future work. |