[PIPE2D-356] Model time-variability in background from darks Created: 14/Feb/19 Updated: 18/Mar/21 |
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | DRP 2-D Pipeline |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | hassan | Assignee: | arnaud.lefur |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
| Story Points: | 8 |
| Description |
|
Following a recent analysis of LAM dark frames, it has been determined that the light source is variable. We therefore need to model the time variability in the background from darks, using a representative set of LAM data. The accuracy for the model is to be determined. |
| Comments |
| Comment by ncaplar [ 14/Feb/19 ] |
|
I just added one figure (FluxInReducedData.png) to illustrate the issue better, showing the structure and level of the background in the defocused data (exposure time = 297 sec). hassan recommended to add the figure "Background_with_time_split_with_sign.png" which shows that the mean background estimated via sigma clipping 1. is mainly a function of exposure time, 2. is different on two sides of defocus (W_ENFCAX is the header keyword used to described defocus). |
| Comment by hassan [ 18/Mar/21 ] |
|
May already be addressed. arnaud.lefur? |
| Comment by arnaud.lefur [ 18/Mar/21 ] |
|
mmmh surprising. ncaplar any insight ? |
| Comment by ncaplar [ 18/Mar/21 ] |
|
I dont know - this was maybe only case for some LAM data? Could we just verify that this is not the case with Subaru data now? If everything looks ok, this could be closed. |