[PIPE2D-304] fluxcalib: stellar library Created: 23/Oct/18 Updated: 23/Dec/22 Resolved: 23/Dec/22 |
|
| Status: | Done |
| Project: | DRP 2-D Pipeline |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Story | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | Masayuki Tanaka | Assignee: | Masayuki Tanaka |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Epic Link: | flux calibration | ||||||||
| Comments |
| Comment by Masayuki Tanaka [ 14/Nov/18 ] |
|
After some literature search, we choose to start with the AMBRE stellar library, which covers 300-1200nm at R~150,000. The parameters covered are 2500 K ≤ T eff ≤ 8000 K, −0.5 ≤ log(g) ≤ 5.5 dex, and |
| Comment by Masayuki Tanaka [ 14/Nov/18 ] |
|
We experimented several functional forms to extrapolate to 1300nm. A simple exponential form works very well. The blackbody (lambda^(-4)) does not work very well contrary to our expectations. |
| Comment by cloomis [ 15/Nov/18 ] |
|
What should the simulator insert above 1200nm? The flat extrapolation? |
| Comment by price [ 15/Nov/18 ] |
|
Either model fit extrapolation won't include Pa-beta at 1282nm. The PFS web page says the instrument only goes out to 1260nm, so this is OK, right? |
| Comment by Masayuki Tanaka [ 15/Nov/18 ] |
|
We do not need to care about Paschen beta as you say. F-stars do not have any strong absorption lines at 1200-1300nm. There are weak absorption lines and we probably need to mask them when we derive the flux calibration vector. We could also ask the author of the AMBRE library to extend the wavelength coverage. I was in touch with the author and he told me that he could extend the library to 1300nm if he had a line list. |
| Comment by hassan [ 05/Mar/19 ] |
|
Masayuki Tanaka: The extension of the AMBRE library to 1260nm is now the subject of a more specific issue, But before we close this issue, please add a comment to this ticket explaining why AMBRE was chosen. |
| Comment by Masayuki Tanaka [ 23/Dec/22 ] |
|
Apologies for having left this ticket open. The reasons why we chose AMBRE are 3 - It covers a wide range of stellar parameters. It is a theoretical library, but we confirmed that the location of the AMBRE spectra on a color-color diagram is consistent with that of observed stars from HSC. |