[PIPE2D-1181] demonstrate spectra extraction on N2 LAM data. Created: 08/Mar/23 Updated: 07/Apr/23 Resolved: 07/Apr/23 |
|
| Status: | Done |
| Project: | DRP 2-D Pipeline |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | arnaud.lefur | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | EngRun | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
| Sprint: | 2DDRP-2023 A |
| Description |
|
We need to demonstrate that we're able to extract n arm spectra using the pipeline. We need few quartz and krypton exposure, if we can interleave some darks as well, that'd be good to check persistence. |
| Comments |
| Comment by arnaud.lefur [ 16/Mar/23 ] |
|
So to be more specific :
repeat this 5 times. |
| Comment by arnaud.lefur [ 16/Mar/23 ] |
|
price when I plot using pfsArm.mask, almost everything get masked, am I misusing something ? |
| Comment by price [ 16/Mar/23 ] |
|
What mask planes do you have, and what are their counts? This might help. |
| Comment by arnaud.lefur [ 17/Mar/23 ] |
|
Thanks, it definely helped, I've attached a file with the masks value and their occurence for each fiber. |
| Comment by price [ 17/Mar/23 ] |
|
Just ignore only the (mask & NO_DATA) != 0 pixels, and you'll get a lot more spectral data. |
| Comment by arnaud.lefur [ 21/Mar/23 ] |
|
Thanks. |
| Comment by price [ 21/Mar/23 ] |
|
INTRP means we interpolated the pixel because it's bad (which makes the image looks nicer). Those pixels should be ignored during the extraction (not because of INTRP, but because of what caused INTRP to get set). If the spectra have bad pixels with INTRP set, it means that there are image pixels in the same row as the INTRP pixels that are also bad but we're not catching. |
| Comment by arnaud.lefur [ 07/Apr/23 ] |
|
The conclusion is that we're able to extract spectra, see figures from N2(sn1). |