[INSTRM-74] only one of the two ion pumps stop Created: 12/Jan/17 Updated: 04/May/17 Resolved: 04/May/17 |
|
| Status: | Done |
| Project: | Instrument control development |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | fmadec | Assignee: | cloomis |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
| Description |
|
11:24:11.680575 .hub 0 cmds d CmdIn="client.pfs","xcu_r1","ionpump off" Only one pump stopped so we re-sent the command 11:24:22.655899 .hub 0 cmds d CmdIn="client.pfs","xcu_r1","ionpump off" the second command stops the the second ion pump |
| Comments |
| Comment by cloomis [ 13/Jan/17 ] |
|
I'll note that the state for ionpump1 was reported as 0/off, but it still reported non-0 voltage¤t. We should check the order of status commands and whether we need a delay after changing state. In other words, I suspect that the pump was in fact turned off. I wonder what 'ionpump status' would have shown. For reference I'm attaching the gory log segment. |
| Comment by fmadec [ 03/Feb/17 ] |
|
11:50:16.684234 .hub 0 cmds d CmdIn="client.pfs","xcu_r1","ionpump off" 11:50:25.884756 .hub 0 cmds d CmdIn="client.pfs","xcu_r1","ionpump off" |
| Comment by cloomis [ 04/May/17 ] |
|
No complaints. Closing. |