[INSTRM-506] FITS Header: correct inline comments for FRAMEID and EXP-ID Created: 03/Oct/18 Updated: 10/Sep/20 Resolved: 10/Sep/20 |
|
| Status: | Done |
| Project: | Instrument control development |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | hassan | Assignee: | cloomis |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | FITS, SPS | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Story Points: | 3 | ||||||||
| Epic Link: | INSTRM-484 | ||||||||
| Sprint: | SM1PD-2020 G2 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
Following from 11. Inline comments for FRAMEID and EXP-ID are the same. |
| Comments |
| Comment by cloomis [ 20/May/20 ] |
|
Am a bit puzzled here. I did: FRAMEID = 'PFSA01767500' / Sequence number in archive EXP-ID = 'PFSE00017675' / PFS exposure visit number HSC has: FRAMEID = 'HSCA16543000' / Image sequential number in archive EXP-ID = 'HSCE00165430' / ID of exposure (shot) for this data And the docs at https://www.naoj.org/Observing/fits/data/basic_keywords_alphabetical.html do not really help me understand the purpose of the two cards. |
| Comment by cloomis [ 10/Sep/20 ] |
|
No comments: assumed to be OK. |