[INSTRM-273] Select/reject open-source alarm handler Created: 13/Oct/17 Updated: 12/Jun/18 Resolved: 11/Jan/18 |
|
| Status: | Won't Fix |
| Project: | Instrument control development |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | cloomis | Assignee: | cloomis |
| Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Sprint: | 2017-10A |
| Description |
|
Evaluate the various open source alarm handling/monitoring systems. Can any support our needs or should we stick with enhancing our own. We absolutely need:
|
| Comments |
| Comment by cloomis [ 13/Oct/17 ] |
|
Waiting on proposals from any of Yoshida, Hiroshige rhl shimono arnaud.lefur fmadec. Will chose by the end of this sprint. |
| Comment by Yoshida, Hiroshige [ 21/Oct/17 ] |
|
Alerta (http://alerta.io) - I tried it for a few minutes, after spending hours to get it going... Below is the quickest (?) steps to install and try it on Debian 9:
|
| Comment by arnaud.lefur [ 26/Oct/17 ] |
|
I have been chatting with a guy from manitou-neo and I have to send him an email where I summarize our needs. |
| Comment by cloomis [ 26/Oct/17 ] |
|
I also looked at alerta a bit, mostly because it is designed to encourage accepting input from many different kinds of sources. So adapting our keywords would be easy. At first I thought it might be a good thing for Subaru, if nothing else. It is intended to help manage and concisely view many active alerts from many organizations and different kinds of feeds. Again, perhaps good for Subaru, but less interesting to PFS. There is no existing support for integrating plotting history with active alerts, which I think would be essential both for Subaru and PFS. There are plugin mechanisms through which we might be able to add them. I would look at it more closely if I were Subaru – I suspect a reasonable development effort would get you what you want – but am less interested for PFS: that development effort would be better served building on the AIT tools. |
| Comment by cloomis [ 11/Jan/18 ] |
|
For internal PFS work, we are not going use an external product. |
| Comment by shimono [ 11/Jan/18 ] |
|
This SHALL be for ICS, but not development infrastructure. |