[INSTRM-2335] Update threshold of alarm for N4 detector temperature Created: 14/Aug/24 Updated: 15/Aug/24 Resolved: 15/Aug/24 |
|
Status: | Done |
Project: | Instrument control development |
Component/s: | ics_alertsActor |
Affects Version/s: | None |
Fix Version/s: | None |
Type: | Task | Priority: | Normal |
Reporter: | yuki.moritani | Assignee: | cloomis |
Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
Labels: | near-term | ||
Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
Original Estimate: | Not Specified |
Sprint: | preRun18August1 |
Description |
ics_alertsActor uses pfs_instdata 1.7.48 for which the n2/n3 h4 detector temperature was adjusted to 101K (note; the original set temperature is 100K). It was in order to control the detector temperature more easily when SCR room temperature is higher. After it, when n4 was installed in June, n4 detector was set to 101K although alerts was not adjusted. We may have the same issue for n1, which was recently installed. So, I think we should either (1) make a new tag-version with all n detector was set to 101K, or (2) change detector temperature to100K. (or do both) |
Comments |
Comment by cloomis [ 15/Aug/24 ] |
I agree with aiming for 101K on all. n2 is the difficult one, where the H4 heater is as low as we want to run it and the ASIC heater is being run quite high in order to try to keep the thing alive: cloomis@shell-ics:~$ for cam in n2 n3 n4; do oneCmd.py xcu_$cam heaters status | grep 'heater.=h4'; done 2024-08-14T19:12:59.196 xcu_n2 i heater2=h4,TEMP,101.00,0.00,0.139,100.9995 2024-08-14T19:12:59.969 xcu_n3 i heater2=h4,TEMP,101.00,0.00,0.164,100.9994 2024-08-14T19:13:00.625 xcu_n4 i heater2=h4,TEMP,101.00,0.00,0.220,100.9996 cloomis@shell-ics:~$ for cam in n2 n3 n4; do oneCmd.py xcu_$cam heaters status | grep 'heater.=asic'; done 2024-08-14T19:12:51.580 xcu_n2 i heater1=asic,TEMP,160.00,0.00,0.691,159.9830 2024-08-14T19:12:52.177 xcu_n3 i heater1=asic,TEMP,155.00,0.00,0.185,154.9971 2024-08-14T19:12:52.841 xcu_n4 i heater1=asic,TEMP,155.00,0.00,0.586,154.9970 |
Comment by yuki.moritani [ 15/Aug/24 ] |
Thank you for the comments. So can we go with 101K for all detectors? |
Comment by cloomis [ 15/Aug/24 ] |
Yes, I think so. |
Comment by cloomis [ 15/Aug/24 ] |
Tagged 1.7.59 |