[INSTRM-193] SM independent exposure control Created: 19/Sep/17 Updated: 14/Dec/17 Resolved: 14/Dec/17 |
|
| Status: | Done |
| Project: | Instrument control development |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Story | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | fmadec | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Sprint: | 2017-10A | ||||||||
| Reviewers: | fmadec | ||||||||
| Description |
|
If I remember well, some years ago, they was a request from IPMU to have a separate control of the two shutters of a Spectrograph Module. I just wanted to clarify one point on the hardware configurations: the red shutters is placed just before the first dichroic, so when the Red shutter is closed, none of CUs see light (Blue, Red and NIR). If the Blue shutter is open while Red shutter is closed, Blue CU will only scattered light due to white coating on the red shutter (done for the back illumination) If the Blue shutter is close and Red Shutter is open, only Red and NIR CU will see light. This has an impact on the exposure control, I don't what is the intend on that but I think it was important to point out this hardware limitation |
| Comments |
| Comment by naoyuki.tamura [ 01/Nov/17 ] |
|
According to my e-mail records, we got an inquiry from Subaru about whether an exposure time can be set differently from arm to arm. But due to the shutter configuration, this is technically not possible. The reason and the limited flexibility are the following:
At the meeting we had with Subaru in Aug 2016, we explained this situation, and they at least understood that the exposure time cannot be chosen arbitrarily from camera to camera due to the hardware (i.e. the shutters) configuration, so we shouldn't have to worry about impossible implementation. Regarding the remaining flexibility:
|
| Comment by fmadec [ 14/Nov/17 ] |
|
That's a very good summary Naoyuki. Thanks. |
| Comment by fmadec [ 14/Dec/17 ] |
|
we agreed on that |