[INSTRM-1671] Study why the Cobra arm length were different between Sep 2021 and June 2022. Created: 15/Jul/22 Updated: 13/Oct/22 Resolved: 02/Oct/22 |
|
| Status: | Done |
| Project: | Instrument control development |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | yuki.moritani | Assignee: | chyan |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | EngRun | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
| Story Points: | 2 |
| Sprint: | preEngRun08Nov |
| Description |
|
In the June 2021 run, the Cobra arm lengths were measured ( At the ICS/PFI+MCS telecon on 8 July, the following action were suggested:
|
| Comments |
| Comment by hassan [ 11/Aug/22 ] |
|
This requires taking more data during the Nov 2022 run when the PFI is on POpt2, on order to compare the arm length data that was taken during the June 2022 run. |
| Comment by chyan [ 01/Oct/22 ] |
|
Attached is the L1/L2 arm lengths measurements of two different epochs. As we can see from the plots, the arm lengths are very consistent in two different measurements. Although the arm-length differences between bench and telescope are still unknown, yet we are confident that the system is stable on telescope. It is know the the measurement from bench comes from a very fast optical lens. It is suspected that the difference may caused by the different transformation function. At this point, I suggest we close this ticket and open another ticket if we are still interesting on the art length differences between bench and telescope. |
| Comment by hassan [ 02/Oct/22 ] |
|
Closing ticket following Chi-Hung recent comment. |