example_circle.png
Figure 1-46.png
[INSTRM-1653] Compare L1/L2 lengths from dot-crossing data Created: 21/Jun/22 Updated: 07/Jul/22 Resolved: 21/Jun/22 |
|
| Status: | Done |
| Project: | Instrument control development |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | chyan | Assignee: | chyan |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | EngRun | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
example_circle.png
Figure 1-46.png
|
| Description |
|
When Neven demonstrate his analysis on the phi and theta crossing data, we realized that this dataset can be used to constraint L1/L2 arm lengths. So, this ticket is to explore, compare and constraint the L1/L2 arm lengths for better dot-crossing result. |
| Comments |
| Comment by chyan [ 21/Jun/22 ] |
rad_dot_cross = pd.read_pickle("/work/ncaplar/BlackDotsData/rad_dot_cross0_77873_77875_v1.pkl")
/work/ncaplar/BlackDots_Jun20_2022_9pm.ipynb |
| Comment by chyan [ 21/Jun/22 ] |
|
Comparing with the round trip data, the dot-crossing data scatter in wider range. This is because the we just fit a small portion of the circle. So, case closed. |
