[INSTRM-1534] Define a better convergence criteria Created: 25/Feb/22 Updated: 02/Sep/22 Resolved: 29/Jul/22 |
|
| Status: | Won't Fix |
| Project: | Instrument control development |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | chyan | Assignee: | chyan |
| Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | EngRun | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Sprint: | PreEngRun05 F, preEngRun07Sep | ||||||||
| Description |
|
Currently, we define 10 micron for cobra convergence criteria. According to the actual operation, some cobra move to nowhere. However, some cobra just not close enough. Those cobra still contribute to survey with lower efficiency. Therefore, this ticket rise this question. Should we define a better convergence criteria other than a region number? |
| Comments |
| Comment by hassan [ 08/Apr/22 ] |
|
To be discussed in the next ICS/PFI telecon (or earlier) with rhl. |
| Comment by hassan [ 15/Apr/22 ] |
|
rhl proposed a different approach where a smoother metric, such as the fraction of the fiber illuminated, is used. Then after analysis, the criterion for establishing convergence can be better determined. |
| Comment by hassan [ 29/Apr/22 ] |
|
Chi-Hung, Craig and Robert will discuss the best approach for this. |
| Comment by chyan [ 29/Jul/22 ] |
|
According to the discussion, we should close this ticket and file more specific ticket based based on June run data. |