Figure 1-41.png
|
Relates |
|||
| relates to |
|
Solving why Nov convergence tests sho... | Done |
[INSTRM-1506] Comparing frame-by-frame and first-frame-only method for FF transformation Created: 19/Jan/22 Updated: 10/Jun/22 Resolved: 10/Jun/22 |
|
| Status: | Done |
| Project: | Instrument control development |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | chyan | Assignee: | chyan |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | EngRun | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
Figure 1-41.png
|
||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Sprint: | PreEngRun06June | ||||||||
| Description |
|
In the ICS/MCS meeting, it is suggested to verify the FF transformation algorithm with seeing data. However, after checking Sep and Nov run data, we did not take seeing data with FF illuminated. We should use the real system to test the frame-by-frame and first-frame-only methods. |
| Comments |
| Comment by hassan [ 11/Feb/22 ] |
|
This can only be addressed on the telescope when the dome is open. So during an engineering run. |
| Comment by chyan [ 10/Jun/22 ] |
|
Based on data from May run, we confirmed that the frame-by-frame correction improved the problem we see in the Nov run.
|
