[INSTRM-1395] Some fiducial fibers are not found Created: 12/Oct/21  Updated: 28/Oct/21  Resolved: 28/Oct/21

Status: Done
Project: Instrument control development
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Task Priority: Normal
Reporter: hassan Assignee: karr
Resolution: Done Votes: 0
Labels: EngRun
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original Estimate: Not Specified

Issue Links:
Blocks
blocks INSTRM-1388 Poor convergence quality during Sep 2... Done
Relates
relates to INSTRM-1391 Theoretical cobra centers are not cor... Done
Story Points: 4
Sprint: EngRun3Cleanup

 Description   

ASIAA reported during the Sept Engineering Run post-mortem telecon 2021-10-04 that some fiducial fibers were not correctly identified. This may have affected the cobra convergence performance.

Comments from RHL below:

If the geometry is close it's not hard to get all of the fiducials right, so is this a bootstrap problem? Either way, we need a command to find the fiducials and update the pfi <--> mcs mapping; there's code in the `PfiTransform` object to do this, but if Jennifer has a better implementation we should definitely do this.

Note that we should find the fiducials without the back-illuminator until the time that the ab-initio guess on the transform is good enough that we can use a matching radius small compared to the distance from the fiducials to the nearest cobra. Or add some smarts to iterate, but simply turning off the back illuminator is easier.

Either way, operationally we need to be able to slew to a field, identify the fiducials, update the mapping, and generate a valid PfiTransform object. I think that the procedure should be
slew to field
illuminate only fiducials
create/update PfiTransform object
turn off fiducials for the rest of the visit
turn on back illumination
converge cobras to the correct places
turn off back illumination
[and, while we're learning about the PFI:
illuminate fiducials
take an MCS exposure
turn off fiducials
so we can learn about stability. We may not actually need to so this]

It should be true that this object is then valid for the entire observation; if the exposure time is long enough and the telescope is tracking this may not be true.



 Comments   
Comment by karr [ 20/Oct/21 ]

Checking visually, the FF are seen, but have lower brightness. Yuki notes in the log that they adjusted the FF illuminator to solve the problem; decreasing the threshold in the centroiding will detect the fainter spots.

Comment by yuki.moritani [ 27/Oct/21 ]

(updates from the informal meeting on 26-27 Oct 2021)
The unstability of brightness of FF came from the h/w: the power voltage was not supplied correctly. After modifying(old) E-box wiring, the power voltage (12V) looked stable. We decided to take several images to see if brightness issue was solved.

Comment by rhl [ 28/Oct/21 ]

So this ticket was, "Some fiducial fibres were not found" rather than "not identified".  I think we can close it, as we also know that they weren't as bright as expected.

Given that we know almost exactly where all the fibres are once the first two or three are found, we should never fail to identify fiducial (and we should be able to find even faint ones).   We should open a new ticket if we start missing or misidentifying fibres.

Comment by hassan [ 28/Oct/21 ]

Closed based on rhl's suggestion.

Generated at Sat Feb 10 16:35:01 JST 2024 using Jira 8.3.4#803005-sha1:1f96e09b3c60279a408a2ae47be3c745f571388b.