[INSTRM-1229] Sort out current `cobra_status` & `cobra_movement` Created: 07/Apr/21 Updated: 16/Apr/21 Resolved: 16/Apr/21 |
|
| Status: | Done |
| Project: | Instrument control development |
| Component/s: | spt_operational_database |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | Kiyoto Yabe | Assignee: | Kiyoto Yabe |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | opDB | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
| Description |
|
Update both tables per discussion of the last phonecon. Rename `cobra_movement` to e.g. `cobra_target` which also includes target position in mm and flag for collision etc. Rename `cobra_status` to e.g. `cobra_matched` which includes matched information from mcs data. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Kiyoto Yabe [ 11/Apr/21 ] |
|
The initial fix can be found in the branch. `cobra_target` (previously `cobra_movement`) includes cobra targeting values such as the target positions and step size of each cobra in each iteration. `cobra_matching` (previously `cobra_status`) covers the matched position of spots on the MCS image. I just revert onto `pfi_nominal_[xy]_mm` as the final cobra destination, which is consistent with the datamodel. Anyway, any feedback regarding structure, naming, additional columns is all welcome. chyan karr cloomis hassan ? Attached below is the zoom-in diagram for the related tables: |
| Comment by cloomis [ 14/Apr/21 ] |
|
Some thoughts:
|
| Comment by Kiyoto Yabe [ 15/Apr/21 ] |
|
This is the second revision, which is a hasty fix so may be something wrong. Anyway, let's talk about this at the phonecon tomorrow. |