[INSTRM-1124] Update grandfibermap with all Cable A-B, B-C, B-S interface mappings Created: 26/Nov/20 Updated: 18/Mar/21 Resolved: 17/Feb/21 |
|
| Status: | Done |
| Project: | Instrument control development |
| Component/s: | pfs_utils |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | cloomis | Assignee: | yuki.moritani |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | SuNSS | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||
| Description |
|
The grandfibermap data file gives the cobra-to-slit fiber mappings, and uses a single "fiber id" which includes the field, spectrograph, an MTP number, and the cobra-in-module number. That ID may or may not be the right one, given what we now know about the A-B-C MTP mappings. In any case, we need to add all the MTP mapping for the end-to-end system. Also, we are adding SuNSS, and it might be worth adding the SuNSS fiber ids to grandfibermap. |
| Comments |
| Comment by hassan [ 11/Dec/20 ] |
|
Assigned ticket to yuki.moritani, with support from jeg and cloomis. |
| Comment by yuki.moritani [ 14/Feb/21 ] |
|
SuNSS can be connected each spectrograph. Should the grand fiber map duplicate SuNSS IDs for each spectrograph? |
| Comment by cloomis [ 14/Feb/21 ] |
|
Personally, I think that the sunss mapping should be to the Cable B connector, if that works. Namely, to U1-N-3-4-5, etc. The mapping routine could apply the right N, and get the right slit hole. |
| Comment by yuki.moritani [ 14/Feb/21 ] |
|
Well, I'm expecting you'd like to have one column for the SuNSS ID in the grand fiber map... Here is a draft of the map. If it is right on the track, and Jim likes it, I'll upload to github and proceed...
|
| Comment by cloomis [ 14/Feb/21 ] |
|
Either way is fine. To be specific:
The second does look less likely to confuse people. |
| Comment by yuki.moritani [ 14/Feb/21 ] |
|
OK. then I'll try to update with the second. |
| Comment by cloomis [ 15/Feb/21 ] |
|
Two small-ish requests. If we do these now I think we only need to update the datafile and the code once for a group of similar issues:
The remaining item for GFM or an associated table is how to encode the engineering fibers and the blanks, so that every slit hole can be described. |
| Comment by yuki.moritani [ 15/Feb/21 ] |
|
Yes, I'm aware of this modification, but may I file another ticket to handle all kinds of modification? I'm also aware another ticket ( |
| Comment by yuki.moritani [ 17/Feb/21 ] |
|
I asked Jim to check the new map, and it looks OK. I merged the branch and close this ticket.. |