[INFRA-323] create a repo for the QA database Created: 27/Sep/23 Updated: 28/Sep/23 Resolved: 28/Sep/23 |
|
| Status: | Done |
| Project: | Software Development Infrastructure |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | Kiyoto Yabe | Assignee: | yuki.moritani |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Reviewers: | Kiyoto Yabe |
| Description |
|
Currently, the schema of QA database is developed on a branch of opDB repository. It would be good to separate it from opDB, so please create a dedicated repo for qaDB. I don't know we still need to keep `spt` but the repo name can be `spt_qa_database`. Comments are welcome.
|
| Comments |
| Comment by yuki.moritani [ 27/Sep/23 ] |
|
If QA covers other output from DRP, spt should be OK, but it will only cover the DRP outputs drp_ should also OK... what do you think? |
| Comment by Kiyoto Yabe [ 27/Sep/23 ] |
|
The DB contains seeing, transparency, etc., which is not necessarily outputs from DRP. |
| Comment by yuki.moritani [ 27/Sep/23 ] |
|
Thank you for clarification. then it will be good not to use drp_ . |
| Comment by Kiyoto Yabe [ 28/Sep/23 ] |
|
Good. |
| Comment by yuki.moritani [ 28/Sep/23 ] |
|
Fine. I made a table for required information to create a repository. could you please review it and edit as you like? |
| Comment by Kiyoto Yabe [ 28/Sep/23 ] |
|
I think it's fine. Thanks. |
| Comment by yuki.moritani [ 28/Sep/23 ] |
|
I created the repository https://github.com/Subaru-PFS/spt_qa_database Once you push the initial commit successfully, could you please close the ticket? |
| Comment by Kiyoto Yabe [ 28/Sep/23 ] |
|
I also close this ticket, thank you. |